Orissa

Rayagada

CC/27/2016

Sri Santosh Kumar Hatta - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, SBI - Opp.Party(s)

Self

12 Oct 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 27 / 2016.                        Date.    12   .    10   . 2018.

 

P R E S E N T .

 

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,                                      President

Sri Gadadhara Sahu,                                                         Member.

Smt.Padmalaya Mishra,.                                                 Member

 

  • .              Cell No.8456000857.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       …….Complainant

        Vrs.

1.The Branch  Manager, State Bank of India, At/Po:Tikiri, Dist: Rayagada.                                                                  

                                                                …  Opposite Parties.

For  the Complainant:- Self.

For the O.P.:- Sri N.K.Das and Sri P.K.Das, Advocates, Rayagada.

.                                                           JUDGEMENT

 

The  present disputes emerges out of the grievance raised in the  complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps for  non credit  a sum of Rs.9,300/- in the S.B. account of the complainant.

On behalf the O.Ps  the learned counsels for the O.Ps appeared and defend the case.

The complainant in person  appeared before the forum  and filed memo stating that after receipt of the notice from the forum the O.P. has credited the amount a sum of Rs.9,300/- in the S.B. account of the  complainant  and does not want to proceed the case further for the best interest of justice.

            The O.Ps  considering the exigencies   of  the matter with out any basis   in the right time properly settled the disputes  at his end to avoid further litigation by  over looking  all the deficiencies  without contesting the present case  in the sense of humanitarian point of view  by following  the principles of  natural  justice in view of justice as contemplated  the  Modos  Operandi  of the O.Ps   no doubt  worthy of credence.

          This forum  perused the memo   filed by the complainant.   Memo is allowed.

          Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed    but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   does not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after received  amount.   Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me

Pronounced on this      12   th.         Day of      October,   2018.

              

            Member.                                             Member.                              President

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.