Smt. K.Sayamma filed a consumer case on 20 Dec 2019 against The Branch Manager, SBI in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/45/2019 and the judgment uploaded on 12 Feb 2020.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,
STATE: ODISHA.
C.C. Case No. 45 / 2019. Date. 6 . 12 . 2019
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President.
Sri Gadadhara Sahu, Member.
Smt. Padmalaya Mishra, Member.
Smt. K.Sayamama, W/O:Late K.Dalayya, Kasturinagar, 7th. lane, Po/Dist:Rayagada, 765 001 (Odisha) …. Complainant.
Versus.
1.The Bramch Manager, SBI J.K.P.M., Campus branch J.K.Pur, Dist:Rayagada.
2.The Regional Manager, SBI, Saipriya Nagar, Dist: Rayagada.
3.The General Manager, SBI Local head office, Bhuabaneswar. .…..Opp.Parties
Counsel for the parties:
For the complainant: - Sri V. Ram Mohan Patnaik, Advocate,Rayagada.
For the O.Ps:- Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kuamandan, Advocate, Rayagada.
JUDGEMENT
The crux of the case is that the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non transfer the amount of complainants late husband to the bank account of the complainant i.e. bank account No.3620568281 for which the complainant sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.
On being noticed the O.Ps appeared through their learned counsel Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumanda and defend the case.
The learned counsel for the complainant has filed a memo submitted that the complainant and the O.Ps have settled the matter out of the court and the O.P.No.1 after closing the bank account of Late K.Dalayya, has deposited the balance amount of Rs.50,532.93 adding interest of Rs. 5,212.00 the total sum of Rs.55,744.00 in the bank account of the complainant on Dt. 19.9.2019. Hence the complainant prays the forum to close the case accordingly as settled out of the court inter alia she is willing to withdraw the case against the O.Ps for the best interest of justice.
Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the O.Ps have not objected the memo filed by the complainant. Perused the record and memo filed by the complainant. The memo is allowed.
Accordingly the present dispute mitigated and the case stands disposed off but O.Ps wriggled out of liabilities & the case closed against them as the complainant do not want to proceed with the case further against the O.Ps after settled the matter amicably out of court. Parties are left to bear their own cost.
Dictated and corrected by me. Pronounced on this 6th Day of December, 2019.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.