Orissa

Kalahandi

CC/31/2015

Sandeep Kuamar Agrawal - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager SBI Rupra Road Branch - Opp.Party(s)

Ganeswar Pattnaik and Parthaba Tandi

06 Jun 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KALAHANDI
NEAR TV CENTRE PADA BHAWANIPATANA KALAHANDI
ODISHA PIN 766001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/31/2015
( Date of Filing : 15 May 2015 )
 
1. Sandeep Kuamar Agrawal
S/O Mahendra Ku Agrawal Rupra Road Narla
Kalahandi
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager SBI Rupra Road Branch
Rupra Road Narla
Kalahandi
Odisha
2. The Regional Manager Region 4 SBI
Regional Business Office Bhawanipatana Municipality market complex
Kalahandi
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. ASHWINI KUMAR SAHOO PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. BHAWANI PATTANIAK MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Ganeswar Pattnaik and Parthaba Tandi, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 06 Jun 2018
Final Order / Judgement

 For the O.P                : Sri S.K. Agrawal, Advocate, Bhawanipatna.

                                                              JUDGEMENT

                        The complainant had taken an educational loan of  Rs.3,00,000/- for his MBA studies at ICFAI University   @ 10.50% interest at the scheme of 0.25% over SBMTLR and the loan was to be repaid in 60 monthly instilments  after one year course period or six months after getting a job whichever is earlier.  The loan account has been closed by the complainant by paying all the outstanding as asked by the OP No.1 on July,2013. The complainant has paid a total sum of Rs.7,66,472/- in total against the loan amount of Rs.3,00,000/-.  Due to some unavoidable circumstances the complainant started paying the loan dues from 31.03.2008. The B OP Bank declared the loan account as NPA under SARFAESI Act,2002 and issued a legal notice  bearing letter No.SARFAESI/315 dt.16.05.2012  and as per the  legal notice the total outstanding liabilities  towards the loan account as on 05.05.2012 was Rs.4,06,454/- and in spite of several requests the OP No. 1 & 2  have  not provided the calculation or loan statement .

                        The OP No.1 has issued Demand Notice bearing letter No. 12/136 dt.13.02.2013 where the OP No.1 disclosed that the irregular outstanding dues as on  date was Rs.1.25 lakhs and  as such  within three months and fifteen days  the complainant total sum of Rs.2,06,500/-  against the claim amount of Rs.1.25 lakhs.   After payment of Rs.2,06,500/-  the loan account should have been regularized and brought out of NPA by the OP 1 & 2. The SARFAESI Agent fees of aRs.60,286.40 collected by the OP 1  after the repayment of  irregular loan dues is illegal. Hence, prayed to direct the Ops to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/-  towards the differences in interest rate and refund the SARFAESI Agent fees of Rs.60,286.40  with interest and award Rs.1,00,000/-  for mental agony, harassment and another Rs.1,00,000/-  for damages and RS.50,000/- towards legal expenses. Hence, this complaint.

                                                            FINDINGS

                        On perusal of the complaint petition and documents filed by the complainant as  per Annexure 2  to 11 and hearing from the complainant it is found that the complainant has  already  repaid the outstanding loan  dues (Educational Loan)  to the OP Bank which is admitted by the OP Bank but  as being aggrieved by the  unfair trade practice on the part of the OP he approached this forum with a prayer to refund the interest  which has been collected  as against the  agreed rate of interest and also to refund the SARFAESI charges collected by the OP Bank which is illegal on the part of the OP along with prayer for compensation on various ground.

                        So the main point for consideration is whether there is unfair trade practice on the part of the OP Bank by collecting higher interest  than agreed  and that the charges of SARFAESI charges are illegal and liable to be refund.

                        Since the OP Bank did not prefer to file the written version and also  not filed any documentary evidence to rebute the claim of the complainant except  the certificate in respect of  liquidation of the loan on dt.8.7.13, the allegation of the complainant can be examined on the basis of document filed by him as per Annexure  II to XI and subsequently the document obtained under R.T.I Act in respect of fee regarding engagement of SARFAESI Agent.

                        Admittedly the complainant obtained a study loan  of rupees three lakhs for a period  from 8.10.2004 to 31.12.2006 @ 10.65%  interest  to be paid in 60 installment  and payable after one year  of  completion of the course or after six months of the beneficiary getting job. It is also admitted by the complainant that due to some financial problem he could not start repayment of the loan in time and started paying from 31.3.2008. It is also admitted  that the loan was secured by equitable mortgage of land  to the tune of 0.06 Dec. vide Khata No.01 Plot No.61 in the name of  father of the complainant.

                        The complainant has assessed that he had repaid Rs.7,66,472/- against the study loan and was  issued with  No dues certificate dt.8.7.13(Annexure-2). The complainant alleged  deficiency of service on the part of the OP bank on the following ground  that there are discrepancy  in the rate of interest charged by OP in the statement dt.3.7.13 and 23.3.13 provided by the OP Bank. As per the above statement the OP Bank has  over charged Rs.1,50,000/- as against  agreed rate of interest. The SARFAESI charges of Rs.60,284.40/- which is recovered from the complainant as per the account statement is illegal as it is against the guideline which is relied on by the complainant which is obtained by him under RTA Act and filed before this forum. The complainant has asserted that  no recovery/resolution agent were engaged by either  OP No.1  or OP No.2 as in  no correspondence or  document the name  of recovery agent or resolution agent has been mentioned. As the complainant himself has repaid all the loan outstanding dues without the intervention of any recovery agent the dues recover from the complainant towards recovery agent charges and surfacie charges are completely illegal and amounts to unfair trade practice. The charges recovered as above  was reflected in the loan statement dt.23.03.13 relied by the complainant  as Annexure 7 and loan statement dt.3.07.13 Annexure 5.

                        The complainant further alleged that the demand notice was served  to him on the wedding day of the complainant i.e. 13.02.13  wherein the irregular outstanding dues  by that date  was Rs.1,25,000/-  and the complainant  repaid Rs.2,06,500/- within three month 15 days of receipt of the notice but in spite of repaying the loan  which has turned to  NPA, the OP Bank issued property vacation  notice on 13.2.13 which is humiliating and illegal and caused mental harassment to the complainant apart from it being unfair trade practice on the part of the Op Bank. The complainant further  alleged that to hide their deficiency before the higher authority to whom the complainant had made various complaint ,the Bank made further allegation that the complainant is sending virus to the Bank which is completely false and remain unproved.

                        The complainant to substantiate his allegation of deficiency  of service also filed the  copy of loan agreement obtained on RTI Act and  could able  to prove that without his consent the OP Bank has changed the interest rate  from SBMTR to SBAR which is unfair trade practice on the part of the OP Bank.

                        So going through the document and argument raised by the complainant we are of the opinion that the complainant has able to prove that the OP Bank are deficiency on service and adopted unfair trade practice and as such allow the prayer of the complainant in part. The complainant has claimed that the Bank has  recovered Rs.1,50,000/- as excess interest and also SARFAESI  charge of Rs.60,284.40/- which is  remained unchallenged by the OP Bank. Hence, it is ordered.

                                                               ORDER.

            The  O.P Bank is directed to refund the excess interest amount of Rs.1,50,000/- and SARFAESI Agent Fees of Rs.60,286.40/- and pay   compensation of Rs.5,000/- towards mental agony and harassment and  litigation  expenses of Rs.2,000/- within 45 days from the date of receipt of this order failing which the OP Bank are liable to pay interest @ 10.05% per annum till the date of its realization.

                       

                        Pronounced in open forum today on this  6th  day of June,2018 under the seal and signature of this forum.

 

 

                            Member                                                        President

Documents relied upon:

By the Complainant:

  1. Copy of Loan arrangement letter
  2. Copy of Certificate dt.08.07.2013
  3. Copy of  Legal Notice under SARFAESI Act 2002 dt.16.05.2012
  4. Copy of email
  5. Copy of  Loan Statement dt.03.07.2013
  6. Copy of Demand Notice dt.13.09.2010
  7. Copy of Loan Statement dt.23.03.2013
  8. Copy of Demand Notice dt.13.02.13
  9. Copy of Marriage Certificate of the complainant
  10. Copy of Property Vacation  Notice dt.18.06.2013
  11. Copy of Loan Agreement
  12. Copy of  Video Conference with CIC dt.12.05.2015

By the Opposite Parties:

  1. Copy of Certificate dt.08.07.2013.      

                                                                                   

 

  •  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ASHWINI KUMAR SAHOO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. BHAWANI PATTANIAK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.