View 7632 Cases Against Sahara Credit Cooperative Society
View 33202 Cases Against Society
Sri E.Satya Narayan filed a consumer case on 29 Dec 2017 against The Branch Manager, Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd., in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/180/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 03 Sep 2018.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,
STATE: ODISHA.
C.C. Case No. 180/ 2017. Date. 26 . 7 . 2018.
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President
Sri GadadharaSahu, Member.
Smt.PadmalayaMishra,. Member
Sri E. Satya Narayan, Fathers Name: Late E. Laxmi Naido, Quarter No. 23/20, Po: J.K.Pur Dist: Rayagada , State:Odisha, Cell No. 77499-37736 R.D. account No.18515102047.
Appala Narasamma Kanimeraka, Father’s name: Tirupati Kanimeraka, Quarter No. 23/20, Po: J.K.Pur Dist: Rayagada , State:Odisha, Cell No. 97016-50537 R.D. account No.18514203478. , State:Odisha, …..Complainants.
Versus.
The Branch Manager, Sahara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., Branch Office, R.K.Nagar, Po/Dist: Rayagada.(Odisha). …Opposite party.
For the Complainant:- Self.
For the O.Ps:- Set exparte
.
JUDGMENT
The present disputes emerges out of the grievance raised in the complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non refund of Recurring deposit Maturity amount of R.D. accounts bearing No. 18515102047, and R.D. No. 18514203478 with accrued interest till realization. The brief facts of the case are summarized here under.
That the complainant No.1 had opened a Recurring Deposit Scheme in Sahara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., bearing R.D. account No. 18515102047, and R.D. No. 18514203478 and deposited Rs.300.00 and Rs. 1,300/-per month respectively for the period from August, 2014 to August,2017 total 36 months. The O.P. No.2 Smt. A.N.Karnimeraka had also deposited Rs.1,300/- per month for period from July, 2012 to June,2017. After maturity date the complainants approached the O.Ps from time to time, but the approaches of the complainants became futile and not heard the grievance of the complainant. Hence this case. The complainant prays the forum direct the O.Ps to refund maturity amounts of above 2(two) R.D. accounts with accrued interest and such other relief as the hon’ble forum deems fit and proper for the best interest of justice.
On being noticed the O.Ps neither entering in to appear before the forum nor filed their written version inspite of more than 04 adjournments has been given to them. Complainant consequently filed his memo and prayer to set exparte of the O.Ps. Observing lapses of around 6 months for which the objectives of the legislature of the C.P. Act going to be destroyed to the prejudice of the interest of the complainant. Hence after hearing the counsel for the complainant set the case exparte against the O.Ps. The action of the O.Ps is against the principles of natural justice as envisaged under section 13(2) (b)(ii) of the Act. Hence the O.P. set exparte as the statutory period for filing of written version was over to close the case with in the time frame permitted by the C.P. Act.
We therefore proceed to dispose of the case, on its merit. We perused the complaint petition and the document filed by the complainant.
FINDINGS.
For determination of this case the point is to be answered.
Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties, if so can the complainant entitle for the reliefs prayed for?
From the documents filed by the complainant it reveals that the complainants had deposited amount in the above organization. In support of deposit of money in different dates the Complainants are filed copies of deposited pass book R.D. account No.18515102047 . In another R.D. account No.18514203478 pass book which are marked as Annexure-I, II. Thus, it is clear that the complainants had paid amounts to the OPs. After ,maturity date they have made several demands to repay the said maturity, but the opposite parties kept silent. Moreover, there is no denial by the opposite parties regarding the deposits made by the complainants. As per the document it is clear that the opposite parties collected so much amount from the public not only from the complainant and the public and these acts of the opposite parties clearly shows their attitude and deficiency in service, hence, the opposite parties have to refunded maturity amounts to the complainants.
The complainants with a hope invested amount with the opposite parties, but because of the acts of the opposite parties, the complainant deprived of to get back his matured amounts and they have moved around the offices of the opposite parties and because of the acts of the opposite parties, they have suffered financially and mentally. To meet the ends of justice the following order is passed.
ORDER.
In resultant, the complaint stands allowed in part, on exparte.
The O.Ps ordered to pay the maturity amounts as recorded in the pass books by the O.Ps in favour of the complainants bearing R.D. account No.18515102047 and another R.D. account No.18514203478 respectively along with accrued interest. Parties are left to bear their own costs.
The above order is to be complied within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. Service the copies of the order to the parties free of cost.
Dictated and corrected by me.
Pronounced in the open Forum today on this 26 th. day of , July., 2018 .
Member Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.