West Bengal

Murshidabad

CC/126/2015

Najrul Ali - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Prayag Branch Office - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Bidishya Sarkar

27 Dec 2018

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Berhampore, Murshidabad.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/126/2015
( Date of Filing : 08 Sep 2015 )
 
1. Najrul Ali
S/O- Arman Ali, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
2. Laila Bibi
W/O- Samiruddin, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
3. Mariyam Bibi
W/O- Sadrul Islam, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
4. Nurnehar Bibi
W/O- Sajjad, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
5. Joly Bibi
W/O- Imali Sk, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
6. Najema Bili
W/O- Laltu Sekh, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
7. Chaharul Islam
W/O- Serajul Sk, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
8. Sadrul
S/O- Arman Ali, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
9. Fudan Bewa
W/O- Late Aynul Sk, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
10. Rebina Khatun
D/O- Fhudan Bewa, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
11. Surma Khatun
D/O- Kabeja Bewa, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
12. Imani Sk
S/O- Abdul Kasem Ali, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
13. Anjila Bibi
PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
14. Anshri Brahma
PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
15. Moriyom Bibi
W/O- Sadrul Islam, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
16. Minara Bibi
W/O- Nazrul Islam, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
17. Fatema Bibi
W/O- Abdul Kashem, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
18. Bewa Saleher
W/O- Late Islam, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
19. Dali Sekh (Bewa)
W/O- Late Najim Sekh, PO & PS- Bhagawangola, Pin- 742135
Murshidabad
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, Prayag Branch Office
Jiagang, Hatibagan, Branch Code- 126, PO & PS- Jiagang, Pin- 742123
Murshidabad
West Bengal
2. The Manager, Prayag Info Tech Hi Rise Linited
Regd Office: P-45, Bhupen Roy Road, Kolkata- 700034
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. ASISH KUMAR SENAPATI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. ALOKA BANDYOPADHYAY MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 27 Dec 2018
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MURSHIDABAD AT BERHAMPORE.

CASE No.CC/126/2015  

 

Date of Filing: 08.09.15                                       Date of Final Order: 27.12.18

 

Complainant: 1. Najrul Ali, S/O Arman Ali

                        2. Laila Bibi, W/O Samiruddin

3.Mariyam Bibi,W/O Sadrul Islam

4.Nurnehar Bibi, W/O Sajjad

5. Joly Bibi, W/O Imali Sk

6. Najema Bibi, W/O Laltu Sekh

7. Chaharul Islam, W/O Sarajul Sk

8. Sadrul, S/O Arman Ali

9. Fudan Bewa, W/O Late Aynul Sk

10. Rebina Khatun, D/O Fhudan Bewa

11. Surma Khatun, D/O Kabeja Bewa

12. Imani Sk, S/O Abul Kasem Ali

13. Anjila Bibi

14. Anshri Brahma

15. Sadrul, S/O Arman Ali

16. Moriyom Bibi, W/O Sadrul Islam

17. Minara Bibi, W/O Nazrul Islam

18. Fatema Bibi, W/O Abul Kashem

19. Bewa Saleher, W/O Late Isla,

20. Dali Sekh (Bewa) W/O Late Najim Sekh

all of PO&PS- Bhagawangola

Dist-Murshidabad

Pin-742135

-Vs-

Opposite Party: 1.The Branch Manager

                              Prayag Branch Office

                               Jiaganj, Hatibagan, Branch Code-126,

                               PO & PS-Jiaganj, Dist-Murshidabad,

                               Pin-742123

                          

       2. The Branch Manager

       Prayag Info Tech Hi Rise Limited

       Regd Office at P-45, Bhupen Roy Road,

       Kol-34

 

 

Agent/Advocate for the Complainant           : Sri. Sougata Biswas

Agent/Advocate for the Opposite Party: Sri. Pranab Kr. Das

 

                       Present:   Sri Asish  Kumar Senapati…………………. .......President.                              

                                       Smt. Aloka Bandyopadhyay ……………………..Member.

                                     

                                     FINAL ORDER

            Mrs. Aloka Bandyopadhyay, Member

        This is a complaint under section 12 of the CP Act, 1986.

                        One Najrul Ali & Others (here in after referred to as the Complainant) filed the case against The Branch Manager, Prayag Branch Office (here in after referred to as the OPs) alleging deficiency in service.

 

            The case of the complaint is as follows:

                         That the OP Company is running the business of money laundering having its Branch Office mentioned in the petition of complaint. That the OP informed the agent and the policy holders that if they deposit their money to the Company (O.P.) they will be benefited. That being assured the Complainants deposited their money as stated in the petition of complaint to OP No.1 in different dates and different scheme and OP No. 2 issued registration certificate against all the investment. That all the certificate started maturing in the month of Sep’13 to July’15. The xerox copy of the above certificate is annexed herewith. That the Complainants many a time went to the office of Op No. 1 to get the refund of matured amount but OP No.1 did not pay any heed to their request and they also visited the office of OP No.2 for the refund of their matured amount but all went in vain. Finding no other alternative, the Complainant filed the instant case for appropriate relief.

                        

                        OP No.1 filed W/V and OP No.2 has not appeared after service of the notice to contest the case.

                        OP No.1 has stated in the W/V denying the allegations of the Complainant but ultimately the OP No.1 also did not appeared to contest the case and no evidence on affidavit has been filed by the OPs in this case. So the case preceded ex-parte against them.

 

Now the question arises whether the Complainant is entitled to get relief as prayed for?

 

Decision with reason

           

                         In this case the Complainant have filed examination in chief on affidavit. But the OPs have not filed any evidence on affidavit and they have not contested the case. So the case has proceeded ex-parte.

                         On perusal of petition of complaint, W/V by the OP No.1 and examination- in -chief filed on behalf of the complaint and materials on record,it is found that the OPs have not rendered any services at all, as mentioned in the certificate issued by them. From the case record it is found that the case has been admitted after admission hearing.

     Considering the Complainants as consumers as OP promised to render the services this instant case has been allowed.

     OPs are service providers but failed to provide services as per their terms and condition and the complainants being borrower ofsuch service became  consumer of the O.Ps. After filing w/v O.Ps had not appeared , so the case has been heard exparte.  
        Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and arguments advanced by the Ld. Advocate on behalf of the Complainants, we are of the opinion that there is deficiency of services on the part of the OPs by not providing proper services as per their terms and conditions and the claim of the Complainants are justified and their evidences are ex-parte and it has not been challenged and the Complainants are entitled for relief as per the documents filed by them but no document has been submitted by the Complainant No.7,namely, Chahrul Islam and nothing has been stated about this in the petition of complaint.

 

Reasons for delay

 

                    The Case was filed on 08.09.15 and admitted on 08.10.15. This Forum tried its level best to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible in terms of the provision under section 13(3A) of the CP Act,1986. Delay in disposal of the case has also been explained in the day to day orders.

        

     In the result, the Complaint case succeeds.

     Fees paid are correct, Hence, it is

    Ordered

 

that the Consumer Complaint Case No. CC/126/2015 be and the same is hereby allowed ex-parte against the OPs.

        The Ops are directed to pay to

  1. Najrul Ali- Rs.25,000/-
  2. Laila Bibi- Rs. 10,000/-
  3. Mariyam Bibi- Rs. 27,000/-
  4. Nurnehar Bibi- Rs. 10,000/-
  5. Joly Bibi- Rs. 40,000/-
  6. Najema Bibi- Rs.20,000/-
  7. Sadrul- Rs.4,000/-
  8. Fudan Bewa- Rs.4,000/-
  9. Rebina Khatun- Rs.4,000/-
  10. Surma Khatun- Rs.10,000/-
  11. Imani Sk.- Rs.1,000/-
  12. Anjila Bibi- Rs.,800/-
  13. Anshri Brahma - Rs.-3,000/-
  14. Minara Bibi- Rs.25,000/-
  15. Fatema Bibi- Rs.4,000/-
  16. Bewa Saleher- Rs.6,000/-
  17. Doli Sekh (Bewa)- Rs.15,000/-

        The OPs are further directed to pay a compensation of Rs. 1000/- to each of the complainant  and a litigation cost of Rs 5000/-only to the complainants.

        All such payment shall be made within 3 months from the date of this order failing which the compliant are at liberty to file the execution.

       

 

 

 

Let plain copy of this order  be supplied free of cost, to each of the parties / Ld. Advocate/Agent on record, by hand  /by post under proper acknowledgment  as per rules, for information and necessary action.

The Final Order will also be available in the following Website:

confonet.nic.in

 

 

Dictated & corrected by me.

 

 

 

 

        Member                                                                                             President.                         

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ASISH KUMAR SENAPATI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. ALOKA BANDYOPADHYAY]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.