Andhra Pradesh

Nellore

CC/79/2016

Dr.Veeramma, W/o. Dr. Murali Krishna - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, ORB. Energy, Pvt.Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

G.V.L.Nagamani, P.jhansi

25 Sep 2017

ORDER

                                                                              Date of Filing     :29-01-2016

                                                                             Date of Disposal:25-09-2017

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM:NELLORE

Monday, this the  25^th day of  SEPTEMEBR, 2017

 

Present:    Sri Sk.Md.Ismail, M.A., LL.B., President

                Sri K. Umamaheswara Rao, M.A., B.L., Member.

                Sri M. Subbarayudu Naidu, B.Com., B.L.,LL.M.,Member

 

C.C.No.79/2016

Dr. Veeramma Chilikoti, W/o.Dr.Murali Krishna, Aged 35 years, Lotus Hospital, Near Raghava Cine Complex, Pogathota, Nellore.                                                             ..… Complainant

                                                             Vs.

The Branch Manager, ORB. Energy Private Limited, 19/8/47/A, RC Road, Hathi ramji Colony, Ground Floor, Beside of ATM, Tirupati, Chittoor-517502.                                                 ..…Opposite party

      This complaint filed u/Section-12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 prays to direct the opposite parties to replace the two steam machines in place of old machines or to pay it’s cost ofRs.1,50,001/-  with interest t 24% p.m. to pay Rs.10,000/- towards  damages  and to grant  Rs.5,000/- towards costs.

                                                             .

          This complaint coming on this day before us for hearing in the presence of                              Smt G.V.L. Nagamani and Smt P. Jhansi, advocates for the complainant and                 Sri Panchagnula Suresh Kumar,advocate for the opposite party  and this Forum made the following:

ORDER

(ORDER BY  Sri Sk. MOHD. ISMAIL, PRESIDENT)

Complainant  called absent.  No representation on behalf of complainant. As seen from the record, the complainant failed to adduce evidence inspite of granting of sufficient time, there is no representation on behalf of complainant. As the complainant did not  shown any interest in prosecuting the case, keeping pendency of the case will not serve the purpose.  Hence, the complaint is dismissed for default.  No costs.

Pronounced by us in the open  Forum, this the   25^th  day of  SEPTEMBER, 2017.

 

              Sd/-                                        Sd/-                                            Sd/-

           MEMBER                           MEMBER                                    PRESIDENT

(2)

 

                                      APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

-Nil-

                                                                                                               Id/-                        

                                                                                                         PRESIDENT

 

Copies to:

 

1.	Smt G.V.L. Nagamani and Smt P. Jhansi, Advocates, Nellore.
2.	Sri Panchagnula Suresh Kumar, Advocate, 17/6/233, A.C.Nagar,                   Nellore-524 002.

Date when free copy was issued: