Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/84/2017

Smt. Sukamani Kanar, aged 58 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Odisha Gramya Bank, Sartha Branch - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Sudhir Kumar Das & others

19 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/84/2017
( Date of Filing : 22 Nov 2017 )
 
1. Smt. Sukamani Kanar, aged 58 years
W/o. Late Dibakar Kanar, At- Indipada, P.O- Nimapada, P.S- Singla, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, Odisha Gramya Bank, Sartha Branch
At/P.O- Sartha, P.S- Singla, Dist- Balasore.
2. The Regional Manager, Odisha Gramya Bank, Regional Office, Balasore
Near Church Building, Katchery Road, At/P.O/Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
3. The Chairman, Odisha Gramya Bank, Head Office, Bhubaneswar
At/P.O- Gandamunda, P.S- Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar.
Khurda
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Amulya Kumar Singha & others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Amulya Kumar Singha & others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Amulya Kumar Singha & others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 19 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for clarification regarding consumer in respect of the complainant & hearing of the case. Neither the complainant nor her Advocate is present nor taken any step. The Advocate for Ops is present & files hazira. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing on the matter could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, Ops are appeared and filed written version. As it appears from the case record, the complainant remained absent and slept over the matter since 20.02.2018 and no step is taken nor did her advocate take any step on her behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the complainant, it is clearly made out that the complainant has no interest to proceed with the case further, for which valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.                          

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed earlier against the Ops shall remain infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.