Date of Filing :18-02-2013
Date of Disposal:20-04-2015
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM:NELLORE
Monday, this the 20th day of April, 2015
PRESENT: Sri P.V. Krishna Murthy, B.A., B.L., President
Sri M. Subbarayudu Naidu, Member.
C.C.No. 29/2013
Yella Revathi,
W/o.Late Nanda Kumar Reddy,
Hindu, Widow, Aged about 30 years,
Presently resident of Gandhi Nagar,
N.G.O.Colony, Buchireddypalem,
Nellore District. ..… Complainant
Vs.
The Branch Manager,
National Insurance Company Limited,
16/1154, Opposite to Sunday Market,
Nellore . …..Opposite Party
.
This complaint coming on 13-04-2015 before us for hearing in the presence of Sri G.V. Ramesh, advocate for the complainant and Sri T.Kumar, advocate for the opposite party and having stood over for consideration till this day and this Forum made the following:
ORDER
(ORDER BY Sri P.V. KRISHNA MURTHY, PRESIDENT)
The brief averments of the complaint are as follows:
The husband of the complainant was having two motor cycles AP 26 AA 1263 (Hero Honda) and AP 26 AF 9232 (Sujuki). The vehicles were insured with the opposite party for the period 31-05-2011 to 30-05-2012. The husband of the complainant met with an accident near Pandluru Cross Road on 28-01-2012, while driving the vehicle AP-26-AF 9232. A criminal case was filed with regard to the above accident. The complainant filed the claim with documents. The claim was repudiated. The same amounts to a deficiency of service. Hence, the complaint for payment of personal accident amount with interest, costs and compensation.
2. The brief averments of the counter of the opposite party are as follows:
The complaint is not maintainable. The allegations made in the complaint are not correct. The complainant is not a consumer. The Herohonda vehicle of the husband of the complainant was insured with the opposite party during 31-05-2011 to 30-05-2012. The Sujuki motor cycle (AP 26 AF 9232) was not insured with the opposite party. The opposite party is not aware of the death of the husband of the complainant in an alleged motor accident. Hence, the opposite party is not liable to the claim. The other allegations of the complainant are denied. The repudiation was valid. There is no deficiency of service. Hence, the complaint may be dismissed.
3. Now the point for consideration is “whether the opposite party committed a deficiency of service?”
4. The complainant filed her affidavit and marked Exs.A1 to A8. On behalf of the opposite party, the administrative officer filed his affidavit and marked Ex.B1.
5. POINT: The complainant is the wife of the deceased. The complainant averred that the deceased was having two motor cycles, both insured with the opposite party, that the policy covers personal accident also, that the deceased met with a motor accident while driving vehicle bearing No.AP 26 AF 9232 and that he died in the said motor accident. It was also averred that she applied for payment of personal accident claim of Rs.1,00,000/- and that the claim was repudiated by the opposite party. This is the deficiency of service leading to the consumer dispute involved in this case. The opposite party denied the coverage of insurance of the vehicle AP 26 AF 9232, by it. In the light of the above denial, the complainant has to establish the insurance coverage of the vehicle by the opposite party.
6. Ex.A1 is an insurance policy for the vehicle AP 26 AA 1268. Ex.A2 is the death certificate. Exs.A3, A4, A5 and A6 are the copies of post mortem examination, inquest, F.I.R and charge sheet respectively. All these documents will not establish the coverage of the insurance of the vehicle involved in the accident. From Ex.A6, it shows that the vehicle driven by another person, dashed against the motor cycle in which the deceased was travelling. Ex.B1 is a copy of Ex.A1.
7. The complainant has to establish that the vehicle on which the deceased was travelling was insured with the opposite party on the date of the accident, to succeed in this case. The petitioner failed to establish the above vital fact. The liability of the opposite party arises only, when the vehicle was covered by insurance, by it. In the absence of insurance coverage, the liability of the opposite party to any claim whatsoever, does not arise. Therefore, the repudiation of the claim of the complainant was right, resulting in no deficiency of service. In the absence of a deficiency of service, the complainant is not entitled to the claim. The repudiation was valid and legal. No consumer dispute was involved in this case. The point is held against the complainant.
8. In the result, the complaint is dismissed, but without costs.
Dictated to Stenographer, transcribed by her corrected and pronounced by us in the open Forum, this the 20th day of April, 2015.
Sd/- Sd/-
MEMBER PRESIDENT
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
Witnesses Examined for the complainant
P.W.1 - | 20-06-2014 | Smt Yalla Revathi, W/o.Late Nanda Kumar Reddy, Nellore District (Chief Examination filed) |
Witnesses Examined for the opposite party
R.W.1 - | 20-06-2014 | Smt B. Manmadha, S/o.B. Praveen, Working as Administrative Officer, Nellore ( Affidavit filed) |
EXHIBITS MARKED FOR THE COMPLAINANT
Ex.A1 - | - | Photocopy of certificate of insurasnce in policy number:550903/31/11/62000004345 in favour of complainant. |
Ex.A2 - | 10-02-2012 | Photocopy of Death Certificate in the name of Yalla Nandakumar Reddy. |
Ex.A3 - | 28-01-2012 | Photocopy of Report of Post Mortem Examination. |
Ex.A4 - | 28-01-2012 | Photocopy of Inquest Report. |
Ex.A5 - | 26-01-2012 | Photocopy of First Information Report in Naidupet Police Station. |
Ex.A6 - | - | Photocopy of charge sheet in the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sullurpet. |
Ex.A7 - | 07-02-2013 | Photocopy of letter from complainant to the opposite party alongwith postal acknowledgement and receipt. |
Ex.A8 - | - | Photocopy of driving licence. |
EXHIBITS MARKED FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTY
Ex.B1 - | - | Duplicate Schedule in policy No.550903/31/11/ 6200000434 alongwith two wheeler package policy terms and conditions. |
Id/-
PRESIDENT
Copies to:
1. | Sri G.V. Ramesh, Advocate, Nellore. |
2. | Sri T. Kumar, Advocate, 17-1-615, Chakali Street, Nellore. |
Date when free copy was issued: