Complaint presented on:  18.10.2016

                                                                          Order pronounced on:   25.10.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

      2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

       PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L., PRESIDENT

                    THIRU. M.UYIRROLI KANNAN B.B.A., B.L.,      MEMBER – I 

 

WEDNESDAY THE 25th  DAY OF OCTOBER 2017

                                      C.C.NO.166/2016

 

Dr.Lalith Narayanan,

S/o.N.Valayapathi,

No.109, Mahaveer Street,

Sathya Nagar, Padi,

Chennai – 600 050.

                                                                                     ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

1.The Branch Manager,

M/s. Renault India Pvt. Ltd.,

4th Floor, A.S.V. Ramana Towers,

37 and 38, Venkatanarayana Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017.

 

2. The Branch Manager,

M/s. Khivraj Pearl,

(A Unit of Khivraj Motors),

No.6, Jawaharlal Nehru Road,

Anna Nagar, Chennai – 600 040.

 

3.The Branch Manager,

M/s. Indus Ind Bank,

No.34, (Old No.115/116),

G.N.Chetty Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017.

 

                                                                             …..Opposite parties

                                                   

Date of complaint             : 10.11.2016

Counsel for complainant             :M/s.S.Subbiah, M.T.Arunan

     P.Vincy Rani, M.Divya

Counsel for  1st opposite party   : M/s. V.Sankar&Lavanya Shankar 

Counsel for  2nd opposite party   : M/s. S.Govindraman,V.S.Srikrishnan

Counsel for  3rd opposite party         : K.Moorthy, S.R.Sundar

 

O R D E R

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

Counsel for the opposite parties present. No representation for the complainant. The complaint was posted for filing the proof affidavit of the complainant 1st time on 14.03.2017. From that hearing the case was adjourned for 7 hearings for filing the proof affidavit of the complainant. He has not filed the same. Lastly from 26.09.2017  hearing today (25.10.2017) adjourned as last chance to file the proof affidavit of the complainant. However, there was no representation on behalf of the complainant till 04.00 p.m and also not filed his proof affidavit. The complainant also called absent.

The attitude of the complainant above shows that non filing of the proof affidavit that he has no interest in prosecuting the complaint. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No costs.

        Pronounced by us on this 25th day of October 2017.

      -sd-        -sd-

MEMBER – I PRESIDENT