West Bengal

Jalpaiguri

CC/86/2022

Mr. Avishek Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Service Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Ujjal Chakraborty

02 Dec 2022

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,
JALPAIGURI
 
Complaint Case No. CC/86/2022
( Date of Filing : 18 Oct 2022 )
 
1. Mr. Avishek Das
S/O Sri Rabin Ch. Das, R/O Nayabasti, (Nibedita Sarani) Ward No 8 Under Jalpaiguri Municipality , P.S .-Kotwali, P.O. and Dist- Jalpaiguri , Pin-735101
Jalpaiguri
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Service Ltd.
Jalpaiguri Branch, At Rudra Complex, 3rd Floor , Kerani Para , (Shilpasamiti Para), PS- Kotwali, P.O and Dist.- Jalpaiguri , Pin- 735101
Jalpaiguri
West Bengal
2. The Manager Kar Automobiles
Assam More, NH-31D, P.S.-Kotwali, P.O. and Dist.- Jalpaiguri, Pin- 735102
Jalpaiguri
West Bengal
3. The Manager Mahindra Frist Choice
C/O Kar Automobiles, Assam More, NH-31D P.S.- Kotwali, P.O. and Dist.- Jalpaiguri, Pin-735102
Jalpaiguri
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. APURBA KUMAR GHOSH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Arundhaty Ray MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. DEBANGSHU BHATTACHARJEE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Ujjal Chakraborty, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 02 Dec 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Today is fixed for S/R, Appearance and filing W.V by the opposite parties.

The Complainant is present through Ld. Lawyer. On behalf of the opposite parties Ld. Advocates files separate vokalatnama along with adjournment petition for filing W/V.                                                                                                                                                       

At this time Ld. Lawyer for the complainant verbally submits that there are so many typographical mistakes he has made in the complainant petition and also prays to not –press the same with a prayer to file the case afresh.

Heard the Complainant, Perused the complaint u/s 35 of the C.P. Act, 2019.

The Complainant submits that he would not press the complaint u/s 35of the C.P. Act, 2019 and an endorsement has been made in the margin of the complaint with remarks “NOT PRESSED”.

Hence, the complaint u/s 35 of the C.P. Act, 2019 is dismissed being not pressed. Complainant is at liberty to file the case afresh.

The copy of this order also available in website – confo-kb-wb@nic.in

Dictated & Corrected by me.

Let a copy be supplied to the complainant free of cost

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. APURBA KUMAR GHOSH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Arundhaty Ray]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. DEBANGSHU BHATTACHARJEE]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.