Orissa

Rayagada

CC/45/2018

Nakula Maohanandia - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, IOB Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Self

14 Feb 2019

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 45 / 2018.                                  Date.   14     .   2    . 2019

P R E S E N T .

 

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,                          President.

Sri  Gadadhara  Sahu,                                           Member.

Smt. Padmalaya  Mishra,                                     Member.

                Sri  Nakula  Mohanandia, S/O: Sri   Bhagirathi  Mohanandia,  At: Deopur, Po:Therubali,    Dist:       Rayagada.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                …Complainant.

                Versus.

                1.The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas  Bank,  Po: Therubali,   Dist:Rayagada.

                2. The Chief Regional Manager,  IOB, Baangalore, State:Karnataka.

                3. The Chief Manager,  IOB,  Chennai, Tamailnadu state.                                                … Opposite parties.

Counsel for the parties:                         

For the complainant: - Self.

For the O.P. Sri  K.Ch.G.S.Kumandan, Advocate, Rayagada          

JUDGEMENT

The  curx of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for non refund of undispensed amount of Rs.7,000/- by the ATM withdrawal made in IOB ATM Therubali  on Dt. 1.3.2018  for which  the complaint  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

                On being noticed the O.Ps have  appeared before the forum through their learned counsel and filed a memo submitted that the complainant and the O.Ps have  settled the matter out of the court and the O..P has credited an amount of Rs. 7,000/- in the S.B. account of the complainant to subside the  present dispute between the complainant & O.Ps  with full and final  satisfaction  of  the complaint  and provide proper service  and no claim further  against them from the complainant as the dispute solved  among themselves. Hence the O.Ps. prays the forum to dispose the case accordingly  as settled out of the court.

       Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the complainant has not objected the memo filed by  the O.P.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the O.P.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of court.  Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me  .            Pronounced on this     14^th.       Day of   February,  2019.

  

Member.                                             Member.                                                             President