Orissa

Rayagada

CC/94/2017

Sri Antarjami Nayak - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Indus Ind Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Sana Jagdish Kumar

17 Oct 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 94 / 2017.                                         Date.     17.   10   . 2017.

P R E S E N T .

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra, Ph.D (Law)          President

Sri GadadharaSahu, B.Sc.                                 Member.

Smt. Padmalaya  Mishra, LL.B.                           Member

Sri Antarjyami Nayak,  S/O: Kuga Nayak, Tikarapada, Po: Muniguda,  Dist: Rayagada  (Odisha).                                                      ... Complainant.

Versus.

The Branch Manager, Indusind Marketing & Financial Services(Indusind bank Ltd), Above  Central  Bank, 2nd. Floor, J.K. Road,  Po/Dist: Rayagada.

The   Manager, Indusind bank Ltd, 107, Ist. Floor, Manorama Estates, Manorama Chamders, Rasulgarh, Bubaneswar, 751010, Dist:Khurda, Odisha.

... Opposite parties.

Counsel for the parties:                                 

For the complainant: - Sri  S.Jagadish Kumar, Advocate, Rayagada

For the O.Ps  :- Sri Pratap  Chandra  Das  and associates, Advocates.

                                               

                                                          J u d g e m e n t.    

          The  present disputes arises out of the complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps for non issue  of  necessary  Loan  clearance certificate in favour of the complainant  towards  finance vehicle.

          The  learned counsel for the O.P. Sri Pratap  Chandra    Das  appeared on behalf of the  O.P. and  refuting the allegations of the complainant and made arguments touching the points both on facts as well as law.

                                                                                                                P..contd….2…

                                                                                                //   2     //

                The learned counsel  for the complainant in person is present before the forum and has submitted   a memo  stating  therein that the complainant did not like to proceed with the case since the matter has been settled  out of court    and not pressing the  complaint petition further. Further the complainant  prays  the forum    to  direct   the O.Ps. to issue necessary clearance certificate  towards the finance vehicles.

                Heard  from the parties. We perused the memo and the memo is allowed. The interim order passed on Dt.21.07.2017  by this forum stands vacated.

                The O.Ps are directed to  issue  necessary  clearance certificate  in favour of the complainant  towards  finance  vehicles  within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. 

                Accordingly the case is disposed of.  Parties are left  to bear their own cost.            

Dictated and corrected by me

Pronounced on this    17th.   Day of       October,   2017.

                       

                                 Member.                                                            Member.                                      President

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.