West Bengal

Rajarhat

CC/491/2022

Hakim Gazi, S/o. Mojam Gazi - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, IIFL Finance Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Mr/ Mainul Islam

13 Sep 2022

ORDER

Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Complaint Case No. CC/491/2022
( Date of Filing : 24 Aug 2022 )
 
1. Hakim Gazi, S/o. Mojam Gazi
Residing at Village and Post Office Dharmatala Panchuria, P.S- K.L.C, Dist- South 24 Parganas, Pin-743502.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, IIFL Finance Limited
Rajarhat Greens 1st Floor, Reckjuani, Bus Root No. 211, Rajarhat Axix Bank Building , P.O- Rajarhat, P.S- Rajarhat, Dist- North 24 Parganas, Kolkata-700135.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Partha Kumar Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 13 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Today is fixed for order.

After taking into account the submission advanced by the Ld. Advocate of the complainant yesterday and the imports of the petition of complaint we see that the complainant took a loan of Rs. 33,500/- (Rupees thirty three thousand five hundred) on 19.08.2021 from the OP (Financial Institution) by mortgaging gold under certain terms and conditions.

It is now alleged by the complainant that the pledged gold has been sold in auction by the money lender without any notice to the complainant. He has already lodged a complaint to Rajarhat P.S. against the aforesaid money lender and has filed this case under CP Act seeking only compensation of Rs. 1,70,000/-. His main allegation against the money lender is that the auction was held for sell of the pledged gold without informing him

A careful perusal of the terms and conditions for the loan reveals that the money lender was authorized to sell pledged articles by auction if its value falls lesser than the required margin as stipulated from time to time or for any other reason. But in that case the borrower would get a notice. The borrower’s entitlement to notice is quite consistent with the principle of natural justice under Common Law that none should be condemned unheard. The money lender is claiming that notice was sent and the borrower has countered claim by stating that no notice was served upon him. For taking such decision the power of Civil Court is required to be exercised.

The CP Act is on branch of law of torts where the only remedy is damages for either deficiency in service or for goods being defective or for unlawful trade practice. The violation of the principle of the natural justice is not akin to the approved ground for filing a case under CP Act.

The complainant may take up his case to the Civil Court where he can get proper relief.

Hence, it is ordered, that the case be and the same is dismissed as not being admitted.

Let a plain copy be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR.

 

Dictated and corrected by

[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Partha Kumar Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.