View 25 Cases Against Idfc Bank
Meena filed a consumer case on 16 Feb 2024 against The Branch Manager, IDFC Bank in the Karnal Consumer Court. The case no is CC/198/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 19 Feb 2024.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.
Complaint No. 198 of 2022
Date of instt. 05.04.2022
Date of Decision: 16.02.2024
Meena C/o Rishipal, resident of H.No.186, Gali No.7, R.K. Puram, Karnal, Haryana.
…….Complainant.
Versus
The Branch Manager, IDFC Bank, SCO 237-P, GF, Urban Estate, Karnal.
…..Opposite party.
Complaint Under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, as amended up-to-date.
Before Sh. Jaswant Singh……President.
Sh. Vineet Kaushik…….Member
Dr. Suman Singh…….….Member
Argued by: Shri Garvit Chopra, counsel for complainant.
Opposite party proceeded against exparte VOD 21.06.2022
(Jaswant Sih President)
ORDER:
The complainant has filed the present complaint Under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the opposite party (hereinafter referred to as ‘OP’) on the averments that complainant has been maintaining a saving account in the bank of OP having an amount of Rs.2,16,033 approx (as on date). Few days ago, when the complainant was trying to seek some transaction via her saving bank account. She became astonished to know that her account has been frozen by OP without any prior intimation to her and when complainant asked about the reason, the OP did not pay any heed towards the request of complainant. Due to said unsatisfactory unanswered act and conduct, the complainant has been suffering financial losses as well as harassment. From the above facts and circumstances, it is clearly established that OP has committed deficiency in services and unfair trade practice. Hence, the present complaint.
2. Despite service of notice none has appeared on behalf of OP and it opted to be proceeded against exparte, vide order dated 21.06.2022 of the Commission.
3. Learned counsel for complainant has tendered into evidence affidavit of complainant Ex.CW1/A, copy of passbook Ex.C1, copy of account statement Ex.C2, legal notice Ex.C3, postal receipt Ex.C4, refusal of legal notice Ex.C5, registered AD Ex.C6 and copy of aadhar card Ex.C7 and closed the evidence on 07.11.2023 by suffering separate statement.
4. We have heard the learned counsel for the complainant and have gone through the record available on the file carefully.
5. Learned counsel for complainant, while reiterating the contents of the complaint, has vehemently argued that the account of the complainant has been freezed by the OP without any reason and rhyme and without intimation to the complainant. Due to the said act of the OP, the complainant has suffered financial loss and has caused harassment to the complainant and lastly prayed for allowing the complaint.
6. The complainant has alleged that she is maintaining a saving account with the OP bank and is having an amount of Rs.2,16,033/- approximately. The factum of having a saving account of the complainant in the OP bank is proved from the passbook Ex.C1. It is also evident from the statement of account Ex.C2 that an amount of Rs.2,16,033/- was lying in the account of complainant on 28.02.2022. The complainant has also alleged that her account has been freezed by the OP without any reason and rhyme and without intimation to the complainant due to the said act, she has suffered huge financial loss and also suffered mental harassment. To rebut the evidence produced by the complainant, OP did not appear and opted to be proceeded against exparte. Thus, the evidence produced by the complainant is unchallenged and unrebutted and there is no reason to disbelieve the same.
7. It is pertinent to mention here that complainant has sent a legal notice Ex.C3 to the OP through her counsel but the OP has refused to accept the said legal notice. This fact has been proved from the refusal Ex.C5.
8. After filing the present complaint by the complainant, this Commission has sent notice of the complaint to the OP and said notice has been duly received by Mr.Govind, the Manager of the OP bank, who has duly stamped the summon and also mentioned his mobile number on the back of the said notice but despite that none has appeared on behalf of OP and chose to proceeded against ex-parte.
9. The Manager of the OP has neither bother of the legal notice nor of summons issued by this Commission. The Manager is a responsible person and this act cannot be expected from such responsible person being Head of the Branch of bank. Hence the act of the OP amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.
10. Thus, as a sequel to abovesaid discussion, we allow the present complaint and direct the OP to unfreeze the saving account No.10078420396 of the complainant. We further direct the OP to pay Rs.25,000/- to the complainant on account of mental agony and harassment suffered by her and Rs.11,000/- for the litigation expense. However, the OP bank is at liberty to recover the abovesaid awarded amount from the salary of the erring officer of the OP bank. This order shall be complied within 45 days from the receipt of copy of this order. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
Announced
Dated: 16.02.2024
President,
District Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, Karnal.
(Vineet Kaushik) (Dr. Suman Singh)
Member Member
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.