Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/492/2022

Hitendrakumar Sharma Q No 9/4 Type V HVF Estate Avadi Chennai 54 - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager HCL Services ltd., Samsung authorised Servies Ghaziabad Utterpradesh 201001 - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

28 Apr 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                       Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                            MEMBER

 

F.A. No.492/2022

 

(Against the Order dt.29.07.2022 made in C.C. No.48/2022 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Thiruvallur)

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF APRIL 2023

 

1. Hitendra Kumar Sharma,

Q. No.9/4, Type-V, HVF Estate,

Avadi,

Chennai – 600 054.                                                     .. Appellant / Complainant.  

-Versus-

1. The Branch Manager,

HCL Services Limited,

C-34, Raj Nagar, RDC,

Samsung Authorized Service Center,

Ghaziabad – 201 001 (U.P.).

 

2. The Branch Manager,

Croma Store,

Pacific Mall,

Plot No.1, Dr. Burman Marg,

Site-IV S,

Ghazhiabad – 201 001 (U.P.).

 

3. The Branch Manager,

Croma Store Khanna Buildings,

AA-5, 2^nd Avenue, Anna Nagar,

Chennai – 600040.

 

4. The Branch Manager,

 Samsung Authorized Service Center,

HI-TECH Solutions, Plot No.1741,

Anna Nagar West,

18^th Main Road,

Chennai – 600 102.                                            .. Respondents  / Opposite parties.

 

Appellant / Complainant                                       : Party in person

For Respondents 2 & 3 / Opposite parties 2 & 3 :  M/s. N. Shanmugaraj

Respondents 1 & 4 / Opposite parties 1 & 4        :  Dismissed

 

      

              This appeal coming up before us on 28.04.2023 for appearance of the appellant, respondents 2 & 3 and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the appellant in person, Respondent Nos.2 & 3.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant in person, Respondent Nos.2 & 3 and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No costs.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT