Bihar

Muzaffarpur

CC/20/2017

Rajendra Roy - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Ltd. & Others - Opp.Party(s)

Anil Kumar Singh & Ranjeet Kumar Pandey

29 Jun 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, MUZAFFARPUR
BIHAR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/20/2017
( Date of Filing : 15 Feb 2017 )
 
1. Rajendra Roy
S.o- Lated Lakhan Roy, R/o- Vill-Bhagwanpur Ratti, P.O.-Balukaram, P.S.-Vaishali, & etc.
Vaishali
Bihar
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Ltd. & Others
Shukla Complex 1st Floor Khudiram Bose Road, Muzaffarpur
Muzaffarpur
Bihar
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Govind Prasad Singh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dr. Narayan Bhagat MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Anil Kumar Singh & Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 29 Jun 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Order

            The complainant has filed this case of claim on 15-02-2017 against  o.p for claim of Rs. 10,80,000/- sum assured amount, Rs. 1lakh for physical, mental, harassment with interest @ 18 % p.a and has further claim for Rs. 10,000/-  as litigation cost.

 The case of complainant   appears from his complaint petition  supported with an affidavit  that he is nominee and father of L.A Randhir Kr. In  the insurance policy purchase by him in his life time  bearing two policies  no.- 01220916 and 01223641 of 18-07-2014 and 13-08-2014 respectively now L.A Randhir kr son of complainant  is no more  and suddenly  faildown on 03-02-2015 and fanted due to electric shock. He was treated by Dr. but Dr. declared him  died. The accident was happen in his house because of  that  FIR was not lodged and postmortem was not done, Panchnama has prepaired, signed by the Villagers, Mukhiya, and Sarpanch, accordingly  the complainant has filed death claim of both policies with all relevant documents by fullfiling the formalities as the L.A died within risk coverage  period of the policies. The company assigned the said death claim to the Pvt. Agency to investigate and submit report the investigator came  to the complainant on 20-01-2016 and taken the signature  of the complainant blank  on paper on which he will get type the matter as the statement of complainant and will be send to company, the complainant has signed over the said paper innocently and the investigator demanded Rs. 50,000/- from the complainant  as brive and threaten  him if  he will not pay. He will get type against him. The complainant became stunned and  he discussed about the fact with the Villagers and he has filed informatory petition to the court  of C.J.M. Hazipur 31-01-2016. He has further alleged that o.p has neither  settled the claim not repudiated  till filing of this case. About more than 14 month than have passed away in awaiting and filing of this case that the o.p  may settled his claim. He has made his claim on 30-11-2015 and as per IRD circular the insurance company had either to settled the claim are repudiated within 3 month and after several request o.p has not taken care of claim of complainant accordingly he has filed this case with aforesaid claim.

             The complainant has filed Xerox  copy of  certain documents  as such first premium  receipt of both policies, death certificate of Randhir Kr issued on 04-02-2015 find mentioned his date of death is 03-02-2015, policy schedule, Panchnama dated  15-02-2015, mentioning the date of death of L.A is 03-02-2015, Certificate of Sarpanch  dated 22-02-2015 , certificate to Mukhiya dated 09-02-2015, certificate of Dr. dated  03-02-2015, certificate of Aaganbari Sevika.   All certificates are regarding the death of L.A, PAN card, Pass book of L.A information petition NO. 375/2016 filed before C.J.M Hazipur dated 30-01-2016, letter indorse to public information officers cum B.D.O dated 10-09-2015, letter indorse to first appellate authority under RTI dated 09-11-2015, petition of RTI  dated 19-12-2015 letter  dated  23-01-2016 for supply of death certificate and family Member certificate issued by C.O Vaishali. The complainant has further  filed  Xerox copy of  decisions passed by  State Commission vide  order dated 07-10-2016 and  J.D 31-05-2018 (NC)

 In this case o.p no.1, 2,3 &4 appeared and filed his w.s dated 30-05-2017 supported with an affidavit alleged therein that  case is false, frivolous, abuse of process of law and liable is to be dismissed and has challenged  the pecuniary jurisdiction of this forum and becoming  the consumer of complainant and have admitted both policies of L.A and also admitted that the complainant is nominee of the said policies and have  only objected that it come under the  knowledge of the company that L.A  had pass away more than  4 years prior to the date of application to purchase the policies on 14-01-2010 that the death certificate shows his  death is on 03-02-2015  and after calculating the birth register and death the concealment of facts arises and have been   frudently taken by the L.A   amounting to Rs. 50,lakh/-. He had another policies and has suppressed the fact by L.A and the company has repudiated the claim of complainant by two separate letters dated 29-03-2016. Regarding the previous policies o.p has metioned in his w.s. and has relied on several decisions as such appeal no. 1560/2004 SC, (1984) I (SCC), (2000) 6 SCC 724 was 2013, (1) SCALE 410 (2010) 10 SCC 567 revision petition  NO. 211/2009, 1966, 35 CR 500, II 2009, CPJ 34 extra.

            o.p has filed supplementary affidavit dated 26-06-2018 with same fact nothing new fact has been added only he has alleged that it has been gathered that the complainant is trying to play big rackete by taking multiple insurance policies   of L.A  who had  already died almost 4 years ago.

            O.P has filed his  written   argument on 26-06-2018 alleging  the same fact nothing new plea has been taken.

                           O.P has filed several Xerox copy of certain papers, as such  policy certificate in the name  of Randhir Kumar L.A  policy No.- 18761316 for death benefit of Rs. 3 lakh, first premium receipt dated 23-07-2014 for the same policy, proposal form initial premium  deposited receipt dated 18-08-2014 proposal form , PAN CARD, Pass book, claim application dated 02-01-2016, Policy Schedule , Diagnosis  certificate dated 16-07-2014 of L.A Randhir Kr, Medical examination report of LA dated 16-07-2014 premium receipt of policy No.- 140714157406 dated 25-07-2014  traditional proposal form dated 16-07-2014 and 11-08-2014, terms conditions of policy application form for claim dated 30-11-2015, death certificate of L.A dated 04-02-2014, date of death as mentioned as 03-02-2015, family  registered issued  by secretary Gram Panchayat

            Considering the facts circumstances material available with the record and allegation of  respective parties it is admittedly clear that the complainant  is nominee of L.A Randhir Kr. Also his father of L.A the policy has been admitted and it is not objected that the L.A was died before deposited of premium  only o.p has objected that the L.A was died before 4 years of taking polices if it is correct then how and why the o.p has issued aforesaid two policies in the name of L.A and have taken the premium of policies it is best known to them only on mere objection shake  him it could not be considered without any effective evidence there is no effective evidence  to substantiate this fact no other objection has been raised by o.p regarding  the jurisdiction the case of claim is total for Rs. 12,50,000/- including the  litigation cost  mental physical harassment comes and pecuniary jurisdiction of this forum.  Regarding the racate this forum is not entitled to give any further against that. Further Axil point of this case has alleged by the o.p that the L.A was died before 4 years in the 2010 and after that in the 2014. He has taken  alleged  appoint is now frustrated by documents  of  Biochemistry test , ECG and Diagnostic report dated 16-04-2014 filed by himself  then it appear before us this document goes to defeat  the allegation of o.p regarding the 4 year before death of L.A

                        Accordingly we are of the opinion that the complainant is found able to prove his case and the entitled to get the death claim of two policies of L.A This document is it self to defeat his objection.

          Accordingly the case is allowed o.p is directed to pay Rs. 4lakh sum assured amount for policy no.- 01223641 and Rs.  6, 80,000/- lakh for the policy no.- 01220916 with interest @ 8 % p.a from filing the case and o.p further directed to pay Rs. 20,000/- physical, mental, harassment, including the litigation cost.  Both payment should be made within one month of the order, otherwise the complainant is entitled to get it recover from the process of law.

 

Member                                                                         President

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Govind Prasad Singh]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dr. Narayan Bhagat]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.