View 4295 Cases Against Cholamandalam
View 30275 Cases Against Finance
Sri gurudhar Khosala filed a consumer case on 02 Jan 2020 against The branch Manager, Cholamandalam Investments Finance Co, Ltd., in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/55/2019 and the judgment uploaded on 08 Jul 2020.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
PO/DIST; RAYAGADA, STATE: ODISHA ,Pin No. 765001
C.C. Case No. 55 / 2019. Date. 02 . 01 . 2020.
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President
Sri Gadadhara Sahu, Member.
Smt. Padmalaya Mishra,. Member
Sri Gurudhar Khosala, S/O: Sri Bayamani Khosala, At/Po: Doraguda, Po/ Dist: Rayagada, State: Odisha. …….Complainant
Vrs.
Counsel for the parties:
For the complainant: - Sri V.Ram Mohan Patnaik, Advocate, Rayagada.
For the O.Ps :- Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumandan, Advocate, Rayagada.
JUDGEMENT.
The crux of the case is that the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non issue of NOC towards finance vehicle OD-18-A-7685 for which the complainant sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.
On being noticed the O.Ps appeared through their learned counsel to defend the case and submitted the NOC of the above vehicle before the forum and prays the forum to close the case for the best interest of justice.
The learned counsel for the complainant and the complainant in person have appeared before the forum on Dt. 11.10.2019 and received the NOC with due acknowledgement from the forum interalia filed a memo to withdraw the above case as he is not interested to proceed the case further.
Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the complainant has not objected the NOC issued in his favour. Perused the record and memo filed by the complainant inter alia NOC issued by the O.Ps on Dt. 27.8.2019. The memo is allowed.
Accordingly the present dispute mitigated and the case stands disposed off but O.Ps wriggled out of liabilities & the case closed against them as the complainant do not want to proceed with the case further against the O.Ps after settled the matter amicably out of court. Parties are left to bear their own cost.
Further the complainant in their memo submitted that the orders may be sent to the O.Ps and a copy to the R.T.O., Rayagada so that the Hypothecation endorsement in the R.C. book of the complainant can be deleted and further directed to the O.Ps to return the second lock of the above vehicle and black cheques.
As per M.V. rule at the time of issue of NOC by the O.Ps they have issued form-35 to the R.T.O., Rayagada for delete the endorsement of hypothecation entry in R.C.book of the complainant. In the present case the O.Ps have issued Form-35 in favour of the complainant. The complainant is directed he should contact the R.T.O., Rayagada personally for early delete the endorsement of hypothecation entry in the R.C. book of finance vehicle Regd. OD-18-A-7685 . Further the O.Ps are directed to return the second lock of the vehicle and blank cheques to the complainant if available.
Accordingly the case is closed.
Dictated and corrected by me. Pronounced on this 2nd Day of January, 2020.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.