The case record is posted today for filing of fresh steps against O.Ps No.2 & 3 by Complainant & consideration of petition Dtd. 30.04.22 and memo Dtd. 07.08.23 filed by O.P No.1. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is present nor taken any step. The Advocate for O.P No.1 is also absent, no steps taken. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, the O.P No.1 was appeared and filed w/v. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 08.03.2022 (i.e. after the date of filing of this case) to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. On the other hand, Advocate for the O.P No.1 filed a memo on Dtd.07.08.23 stating that the complainant remained absent since long as his claim was already settled by L.I.C, for which the case may be dismissed. Considering the memo submitted by the O.P No.1 and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. Both the petition Dtd. 30.04.22 and memo Dtd.07.08.23 filed by O.P No.1 are disposed of accordingly.