West Bengal

StateCommission

CC/537/2018

Shamik Chakravarty - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others - Opp.Party(s)

Raja Mantosh

01 Aug 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
Complaint Case No. CC/537/2018
( Date of Filing : 24 Jul 2018 )
 
1. Shamik Chakravarty
14B, Dover Lane, P.S. - Gariahat, Kolkata - 700 029.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others
164/1, Manicktala Main Road, Mani Square, 6th Floor, Canal Circle Road, premises no. 41, Kolkata, W.B. - 700 054.
2. Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
Regd. & Head office at GE Plaza, Airport Road, Yerawada, Pune - 411 006.
3. Bajaj Finance Ltd.
1201, Infinity Bench Mark, Plot -G-1, Salt Lake City, Sector -V, Block - EP & GP, Kolkata, W.B. - 700 091.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA PRESIDING MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Raja Mantosh, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 01 Aug 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Today is fixed for passing order in respect of the admissibility of the complaint case.

Heard the Ld. Advocate for the Complainant in the matter.

The complaint case originates over repudiation of Complainant’s insurance claim for a sum of Rs. 15,18,878/- by the OP Insurer.  Besides this amount, the Complainant has also prayed for compensation amounting to Rs. 5,00,000/- and litigation cost for a sum of Rs. 50,000/-.

On going through the petition of complaint, I find that, in this case the policyholder passed away on 20-03-2018 and Complainant’s claim in this regard was repudiated by the OP Insurance Company on 31-05-2018. 

It appears from the office record that the instant complaint case was filed on 24-07-2018, i.e., within 2 months of repudiation of Complainant’s claim.  The Complainant though claimed compensation to the tune of Rs. 5,00,000/-, the Ld. Advocate could not offer any satisfactory explanation behind claiming such whooping sum as compensation.  It is always desirable that the extent of compensation claimed should be realistic and reasonable.  There is every reason to believe that with the sole objective of attracting the jurisdiction of this Commission and bypassing the Ld. District Forum, such exorbitant sum has been claimed as compensation which cannot be encouraged under any circumstances. 

Accordingly, I am not inclined to allow this complaint. The complaint case is dismissed as such. Complainant is directed to move the appropriate District Forum for agitating his grievance.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.