Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

EA/23/05

SMT KARREDULA ARUNA DEVI - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE BRANCH MANAGER ANDHRA BANK - Opp.Party(s)

GAMPA VENKATESHAM

04 Aug 2014

ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AT HYDERABAD
 
Execution Application No. EA/23/05
In
CC/01/30
 
1. SMT KARREDULA ARUNA DEVI
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE BRANCH MANAGER ANDHRA BANK
Andhra Pradesh
2. STATE BANK OF HYD
SERVICE BRANCH SAIFABAD HYD REP BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER
HYD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Gopala Krishna Tamada PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO Member
 HON'ABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD

 

PP 23 of 2005 in CD 30 of 2001

 

 

Between:            

 

Smt. Karreddula Aruna Devi

W/o late Sri Bhaskar Rao

Aged 45 years,

Occ ; Housewife, R/o P & T colony

Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad                      ..      petitioner/complainant

 

And

 

  1. The Branch Manager

Andhra Bank, PGRLC Jr. College Branch

Vikasnagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

 

  1. State Bank of Hyderabad

Service Branch, Saifabad

Hyderabad rep. by its Chief Manager

 

( O.P. No. 2 impleaded as per the order

Dated 1.11.2004 in CD IA No. 1636/2004)…. respondents/Opposite parties

 

 

                         

 

Counsel for the Petitioner              :       Mr. G. Venkatesham

 

Counsel for the Respondents                 :       Mr. A.V.S.S. Prasad

 

 

QUORUM:  

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, PRESIDENT

AND

SRI  R. LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

  MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN

Oral Order : ( As per Hon’ble Sri Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada, President )                                                       ***

 

 

On 22.07.2014, office reported that FA 139 of 2005 was disposed of on 15.10.2009 by the Hon’ ble National Commission and the order copy was not available. In such circumstances it is inferred that there is no stay in the matter.  No representation for the petitioner and the respondent.  For recording the sworn statement of the petitioner/complainant, the matter was adjourned  to 30.07.2014.  On 30.07.2014, none appears and hence the matter was posted to 31.07.2014  under the caption of ‘ dismissal’ . On 31.7.2014 as the advocates boycott  the Court, the matter was adjourned to this day. Today also, none appears on both sides. Hence the P.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution.

 

                                                        PRESIDENT

 

                                                        MEMBER

 

                                                        MEMBER

                                                        DATED :04.08.2014.

                                               

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Gopala Krishna Tamada]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
Member
 
[HON'ABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.