Maharashtra

Bhandara

EA/12/34

Manish Sudam Khobragade - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Bhandara Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., Through Branch Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Adv. K.I.Ramteke

14 Oct 2014

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BHANDARA
Near Akhil Sabhagruha, Ganeshpur Road,Bhandara
 
Execution Application No. EA/12/34
In
Complaint Case No. CC/06/60
 
1. Manish Sudam Khobragade
R/o. Post. Manegaon/ Bazar, Dist. Bhandara
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. ATUL D. ALSI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. GEETA R. BADWAIK MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. HEMANTKUMAR PATERIA MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

वसुली प्रकरण क्र. EA/ 34/ 2012                    दाखल दि. 06.03.2013

                                                                                          आदेश दि. 14.10.2014                                                    

 

अर्जदार            :-           मनिष सुदाम खोब्रागडे

                              वय – 31 वर्षे, धंदा – व्‍यापार,

                              रा.पोस्‍ट - मानेगांव बाजार                     

 

 

-: विरुद्ध :-

 

 

गैरअर्जदार          :-           शाखा व्‍यवस्‍थापक,

                              भंडारा अर्बन को ऑपरेटीव्‍ह बँक लिमी.                           

                              मुख्‍य शाखा,गांधी चौक,भंडारा

                              ता.जि.भंडारा                                                   

                             

                              

गणपूर्ती            :-           मा. अध्‍यक्ष श्री अतुल दि. आळशी

                              मा. सदस्‍या श्रीमती गीता रा. बडवाईक

                              मा.सदस्‍य हेमंतकुमार पटेरिया           

 

उपस्थिती           :-           अर्जदारातर्फे अॅड.रामटेके.

                              वि.प.तर्फे अॅड.लांबट                             

                              .

(आदेश पारित द्वारा मा. अध्‍यक्ष श्री अतुल दि. आळशी )

 

-//    दे    //-

(पारित दिनांक 14 ऑक्‍टोंबर 2014)

 

Order Below Ex.1

 

The applicant/Complainant has filed recovery proceedings u/s 25 of c.p.Act for recovery  of  Term deposit amount of  Rs. 8451/- which was deposited vide receipt No-62420 on dt.13/1/2005  ale  No 16179 to be  matured on 13/1/2008 & share certificate of  Rs. 1200/-

 

          The counsel for applicant submits that the non applicant bank has wrongle deposited the above amount of  term deposit share certificate of No9651/-  in loan account of applicant . The bank has no authority and Hon’ble court did not direct to deposit the amount in loan. That amount of  Rs.9651/- shall be refunded to applicant.

 

          The counsel for non-applicant bank Adv. Lambat submits, As per agreement & lien & set off executed by applicant on 13-1-05 and as per judgement  of   Hon’ble   forum   passed   on  28/2/2007  in C.C. Case No.

60/2006, the amount of term deposit & share certified was transfered towards loan acoount towards outstanding loan account. The bank has deposited receipt & entries are filed on record. The bank has deposited the compensation amount of Rs.65,655/- from bank personal account to the loan account of the applicant/Complainant as per judgement passed in C.C. Case No. 60/2006 and there is nothing outstanding. Hence the loan account  is closed on 1/6/2012 & intimated to complaintant. The pursis in repeat & detailed entries filed on page no 27 dt.12/3/2014. Hence the case be disposed off.

 

          As per pursis dt. 12/3/2014 and statement of account filed by bank the non applicant has complied the order forum passed C.C. Case No. 60/2006. As per contract & lien and set off executed between applicant & non applicant on dt.13/1/2005 the bank has its sole discreation and without notice combine & consolidate any sum as sums standing to the credit of any one or more of such account in or towards satisfaction of any liabilities to you or any other account or in any other respect, whether such liabilities be actual or contingent, primary or collateral and several or joint. Therefore the bank has every right to recover outstanding loan amount from security such as term deposit & share certificate & deposit the same in  loan account of applicant.  The loan of applicant was in the name of his firm. The applicant has admitted the contract & lien. He has not challenge the legality & execution of agreement, therefore that agreement which was executed the time of disbursement of loan is binding on applicant till satisfaction of  loan amount. The Judgement of Forum can’t be interpreted without the violating the terms and conditions of agreement of Lien & Hypothecation. The bank has complied the order, hence the execution proceeding is deserve to be disposed off.

 

Order

 

  1. The recovery proceding is disposed off.

 

 

                                                                             

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ATUL D. ALSI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. GEETA R. BADWAIK]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. HEMANTKUMAR PATERIA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.