Sri Raghunath Rath filed a consumer case on 14 Jan 2019 against The BEO, in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/154/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 15 Mar 2019.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,
STATE: ODISHA.
C.C. Case No. 154/ 2017. Date. 5 . 01 . 2019.
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President
Sri GadadharaSahu, Member.
Smt.PadmalayaMishra,. Member
Sri Raghunath Rath, At: S.B.I. Street, Po:Gudari, Dist: Rayagada, State: Odisha. … Complainant.
Versus.
1.The Block Education Officer, At/Po: Gudari, Dist: Rayagada.
2.The District Education officer, Po/Dist: Rayagada. …Opposite party.
For the Complainant:- Self.
For the O.Ps:- Self.
JUDGEMENT
The factual matrix of the case is that the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non compliance of Letter No. 6299/CA Dt.22.07.2017 of Controller of Accounts, Odisha, Bhubaneswar for which the complainant sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.
That the complainant was working as a Head Master, At: Paik Street U.P. School, Gudari, Dist: Rayagada in School and Mass Education Department under Block Education Officer, Gudari and retired on Dt.30.09.2016 on attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years. The complainant submitted all pension papers before the O.P. No.1. for sanction of pension and final withdrawal of G.P.F. In turn the O.P. No.1 forwarded the complainants pension, G.P.F papers for sanction of pension and final G.P. F to the Controller of Accounts, Odisha, Bhubaneswar. The Controller of Accounts, Odisha, Bhubaneswar vide their letter No. 6299/CA Dt. 22.07.2017 has returned to the O.P. No. 1 with a remark therein the errors, which is required for compliance there to. Above one month has already been lapsed but no action has been taken by the O.P. No.1 till date for compliance of the above letter . From time to time the complainant approached the O.P. No.1 to comply the above objection made by the Controller of Accounts, Odisha, Bhubaneswar vide their Letter No. 6299/CA Dt.22.07.2017. But till date the O.P. No.1 has not complied the above letter. Hence this case filed by the complainant before the forum for redressal of his grievance. The complainant prays the forum direct the O.Ps. for compliance of Letter No. 6299/CA Dt.22.07.2017 of Controller of Accounts, Odisha, Bhubaneswar immediately inter alia such other relief as the hon’ble forum deems fit and proper under circumstances of the case for the best interest of justice.
On being noticed the O.Ps filed joint written version. The O.Ps in their written version submitted that the Letter No. 6299/CA Dt.22.07.2017 of Controller of Accounts, Odisha, Bhubaneswar was received on Dt.7.9.2017 and after that the O.P. No.1 has informed to the complainant to come to the office and put his signature on the final GPF form in part-III. There after the complainant was living at Pune for medical treatment and he did not come in time. So the O.P. No.1 has issued letter to his home address and directed the party to attend the office for putting signature on the paper and coporate the office for his work vide this office letter No.1019 Dt. 12.9.2017, but the complainant did not attend the office, even he was present at his home. Then three reminding letters was issued to the complainant from time to time for the same purpose, but there was no response from the complainant. Finally the O.Ps moved to the house of the complainant and bring him to the office and thereafter his pending work was complianced and the final GPF of Sri Rath was sent to the Controller of of Accounts, Odisha, Bhubaneswar vide this office letter No. 1333 dt. 18.11.2017. So no work is pending at this level. The O.Ps prays the forum to dismiss the case against the O.Ps for the best interest of justice.
Heard arguments from the complainant inter alia O.Ps. Perused the record, documents, written version filed by the parties.
This forum examined the entire material on record and given a thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced before us by the parties touching the points both on the facts as well as on law.
FINDINGS.
From the records it reveals that, there is no dispute that the complainant was working as a Headmaster at Paik Street Primary School under Block Education Officer, Gudari, Dist: Rayagada. He was retired on Dt. 30.9.2016 on attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years of age.
The grievance of the complainant was considered by the O.Ps. the final GPF of Sri Rath was sent to the Controller of of Accounts, Odisha, Bhubaneswar vide letter No. 1333 dt. 18.11.2017 O.P. No. 1.
The O.Ps are committed to the service of the public and the O.Ps have acceded to the relief claimed by the complainant expeditiously within their limits being duty bound and there is no deficiency in service.
This forum observed the O.Ps. after receipt of notice from the Forum promptly the complied the pension matter of the complainant and there is no deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps. The present case in hand the complainant is not entitled any compensation from the O.Ps.
To meet the ends of justice the following order is passed.
ORDER.
Accordingly the case stands disposed off. There is no order as to cost and compensation.
Dictated and corrected by me. Pronounced on this 5th.day of January, 2019.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.