Orissa

Rayagada

CC/79/2017

Sri Kaviti Markandaya - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Bajaj Auto Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

06 Nov 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 79 / 2017.                                         Date.   22   . 9   . 2018.

P R E S E N T .

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,                          President

Sri Gadadhara Sahu,                                                                       Member.

Smt.Padmalaya Mishra,.                                                                Member

 

Sri Kavili Markandaya, S/O: K.Nagabhusan Rao,  At/Po: Komatlapata,  Dist.Rayagada, State:  Odisha.                                                                                              …….Complainant

Vrs.

1.The Proprietor, Bajaj Auto Ltd., Akurdi, Pune- 411035.

2.The Manager, Kalinga Auto Service,Kalinga Road, Bhawanipatna, Kalahandi Dist.

3.The Manager, Autorised  Auto Services Centre, Bhubaneswar.

4. The Manager, Indusind Bank, Rayagada.                            .…..Opp.Parties

 

For the Complainant:-Sri  Harichandan, Advocate, Rayagada.

For the O.Ps:-Sri R.N.Patra, and Sri  M.N.Nayak, advocate, Rayagada.

.

                                        J u d g e m e n t.

         

          The  present disputes arises out of the complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps for non-replacement  of  New vehicle  which was  not  properly functioning within the warranty period.

 

          On being noticed   and  as per the  instruction of  the  complainant O.Ps are given proper service  in as much as the O.Ps have rectified  all defects of the above set   in question   to the satisfaction of the complainant & there is no defect in the said set. 

 

          The learned counsel for the complainant present and filed a memo  to drop the proceeding against the O.Ps  as  the O.Ps  are given  proper service  to the satisfaction of the complainant   and rectified all the defects  of the vehicle  question  by changing  all the defective parts  as well as tyres  of the two wheeler  and their  disputes  amicably resolved out of court  after getting proper service from the O.Ps. 

          The case is advanced today on the strength of the advance petition filed by the learned counsel for the O.Ps.

                We perused the documents   filed by the complainant  as well as the O.Ps in our considered view   there is nothing  to disbelieve  the contents of the O.Ps regarding  their service  to  the satisfaction of the complainant  and forum do not find any reason  to hold the O.Ps.

          The O.Ps  considering the exigencies   of  the matter with out any basis   in the right time properly settled the disputes  at his end to avoid further litigation by  over looking  all the deficiencies  without contesting the present case  in the sense of humanitarian point of view  by following  the principles of  natural  justice in view of justice as contemplated  the  Modos  Operandi  of the O.Ps   no doubt  worthy of credence.

                            Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed    but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after rectification the defects of the Motor cycle. Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me

Pronounced on this        .         Day of       September,   2018.

               

                 

                Member.                                                             Member.                                      President