On perusal of the complainant of the complainant, written version filed by OP-Finance Company as well as on going through the documents made available mainly by the OP-Finance Company and after hearing they arguments of the Advocates for the parties, the matter in dispute in between the parties relates to Finance matter i.e. dispute over settlement of accounts. Complainant's claim is that the OP-Finance Company have made. Inflated claim as despite of his regular repayment various amount charged under various heads including OD interest appeared in the statement of Account. OP-Finance company's claim is that as per the terms and conditions of the agreement executed between the parties and as per payment schedule issued to the complainant he defaulted to pay the regular installments and as' per the agreement clause it is empowered to seize the vehicle under hypothecation in case of default in repayment of regular installments. OP-Finance Company assert that the claim laid against them is based on correct statement of accounts. The main and important document i.e. the hypothecation agreement executed in between the complainant and Finance Company has been placed by the OP-Finance Company. This particular agreement can4 be termed as a contract in between the parties and the conditions agreed by them must be adhered to. The agreement clauses, no doubt have empowered the finance Company to charge various amounts under various heads including repossession of the vehicle on default of repayment of installments but it should be with the intervention of the proper court of law. The main prayer of the complainant has been resolved by way of interim order dtd.22.02.2017. Dispute relating to account cannot be resolved by this forum. Accordingly the C.C. Case is dismissed.