Karnataka

Dharwad

CC/26/2017

Manohar H.Meharwade - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Authorized Signatory,Country Vacations, - Opp.Party(s)

R.B.Challamarad

31 Jan 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER
DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, DHARWAD.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/26/2017
 
1. Manohar H.Meharwade
R/o: Kuratti Peth, Betgeri,Tq:Gadag,
Gadag
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Authorized Signatory,Country Vacations,
A division of country club, Hospitality & Holiday Ltd, Amrutha Castle, 5-9-16,Saifabad, Opp Secretariat,
Hydrabad
Telangana
2. The Manager, Country Vacations,
A division of country Club, Hospitality & Holiday Ltd, Branch Office, 3rd Floor, Vernekar Plaza, Deshpande nagar,Hubli-29,
Dharwad
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SMT.SAMIUNNISA.C.H , IN CHARGE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHRI.BASAVARAJ S.KERI, IN CHARGE MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:R.B.Challamarad, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 31 Jan 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Order on Admission of the complaint

Complainant filed this complaint against the OPS stating that he has paid a sum of Rs 1,36,000 towards the advanced amount for taking club by vocation membership further submits that complainant is not aware of the terms and conditions of the club and further submits that OP-2 sent an agreement to the complainant  and submits that while going through the agreement,  the condition in the agreement are not in a consumer favour . It only speaks the profit of the club not for the customer.

            Further complainant submits that he had not taken the club membership and vocation membership from the OPS. Hence he prayed to order for refund the advance amount and claim a Rs.3,00,000/- towards compensation and other reliefs. Heard on admission while scanning the documents on record and complainant , it seems that complainant is advocate and notary practicing at Gadag district. Moreover the agreement produced by the complainant is very much clear that the complainant was taken a membership of club and vocation and moreover complainant also duly signed on it. It is very much clear that the consumer fora establish for to look after the genuine consumer to give relief. Here complainant was invest his amount for his profit. As such compliant is not fall under Consumer Protect Act . Hence complaint is dismissed. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SMT.SAMIUNNISA.C.H , IN CHARGE]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHRI.BASAVARAJ S.KERI, IN CHARGE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.