Andhra Pradesh

East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry

CC/78/2015

Peesapati Venkata Satyanarayana Sastry - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Authorised Person, SVS Communications - Opp.Party(s)

S.S.Prakasa Rao

19 Apr 2016

ORDER

                                                                                             Date of filing:        31.12.2015

                                                                                             Date of Disposal:   19.04.2016

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-II,

EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT RAJAHMUNDRY

 

                     PRESENT:           Smt H.V. Ramana, B.Com., L.L.M.,   President (FAC)

                                  Sri A. Madhusudana Rao, M.Com., B.L.,  MEMBER          

 

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT No.78 /2015

 

Tuesday, the 19th day of April, 2016

 

Between:-

 

Peesapati Venkata Satyanarayana Sastry, S/o. Surya Prakasam,

Aged 60 years, R/o. D.No.46-16-38, Teja Vihar, Danavaipeta,

Rajahmundry – 533 103.                                                                      …  Complainant

 

                                                And

 

1)  The Authorised person, SVS Communications,

      D.No.45-34-9A, Opp. Seelam Nukaraju Complex,

      Gorakshanapeta, Rajahmundry -533 103.

 

2)  The Authorised person, Masters, D.No.29-33-58,

      Opp. Krishna Dental Care, Devi Chowk,

      Near Alluri Seetharamaraju Junction,

      Rajahmundry – 533 104.

 

3)  The Authorised person, ZTE Corporation,

      Millennium Business Park, A/8, Sector – 1, 2nd floor,

      A – Wing Mahape, Navi Mumbai – 400 710.

 

4)  The Authorised person, Bharati Crescent, 1,

      Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, Phase – II,

      New Delhi – 110 070.                                                                   …  Opposite parties

  

This case is coming on today before this Forum in the presence of  Sri S.S. Prakasa Rao, Advocate for the complainant and the 2nd opposite party having been set ex parte and Sri V. Srinivasa Rao, Advocate for the 4th opposite party, this Forum made the following:-

 

ORDER

 

(Per Smt. H.V. Ramana, President (FAC))

 

This is a complaint filed by the complainant under Section 12 of the consumer Protection Act 1986 to direct the opposite parties to pay Rs.50,000/- towards compensation for mental agony; award costs incurred by the complainant at Rs.100/- per day till the date of repayment of the new unit modem; to replace the adjusting modem with new piece of modem and award costs of the complaint.

2.         Both parties filed joint memo that the matter is settled out of Forum and the 4th respondent filed D.D. for Rs.10,000/- bearing No.961534 drawn on HDFC Bank dt.07.04.2016.  Hence, the complaint is dismissed without costs.

 

Pronounced in Open Forum, on this the 19th day of April, 2016.

 

       

         Sd/-                                                                                                     Sd/-

      MEMBER                                                                                    PRESIDENT(FAC)

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.