Kerala

Kasaragod

C.C.No.72/2006

Mathew K.T, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Authorised Officer, - Opp.Party(s)

N.P.Ravindran

10 Apr 2008

ORDER


.
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KASARAGOD
consumer case(CC) No. C.C.No.72/2006

Mathew K.T, 		...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Authorised Officer, 		...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KASARAGOD CC.NO.72/06 Dated this, the 10th April 2008 PRESENT: SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ : PRESIDENT SMT.P.RAMADEVI : MEMBER SMT.P.P.SHYMALADEVI: : MEMBER Mathew.K.T S/o Thomas, Koonammakkil House,Kallar, : complainant Po.Rajapuram-671532. The Authorised Officer, Khabiya Enterprises,57, Opposite party Erulappan Street,Chennai-600079. : ORDER Complainant represented. Counsel for the complainant submitted that the vehicle involved in the complaint is already sold. Hence the complaint became infructious. Upon this submission the complaint is dismissed as not pressed. Member Member President Dated this, the 10th April 2008