Kerala

StateCommission

A/10/359

T.P.Jose - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Asst.Engineer,KSEB - Opp.Party(s)

S.Reghukumar

20 Jul 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/10/359
(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/04/2010 in Case No. CC/08/944 of District Trissur)
1. T.P.JoseThaliyanayath House,Alathur,AnnamanadaThrissurKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. The Asst.Engineer,KSEBAnnamanadaThrissurKerala ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

 

APPEAL No.359/2010

 

JUDGMENT DATED:20-07-2010

 

 

PRESENT:

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU              :PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                             : MEMBER

 

T.P.Jose,

Thaliyanayath House.P.O,                                               : APPELLANT

Alathur (Via), Annammanada,

Thrissur.

 

(By Adv:Sri.S.Reghukumar)

 

            Vs.

1.Assistant Engineer, KSEB,

  Annammanada, Thrissur.

                                                                                                : RESPONDENTS

2.Secretary, KSEB,

  Thiruvananthapuram.

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU:PRESIDENT

 

 

The appellant is the complainant in CC.944/08 in the file of CDRF, Thrissur.

2. The complaint has been filed alleging excess demand and collection of amount for providing electric connection.

3. The opposite parties were absent and set exparte before the Forum.

4. The evidence adduced consisted of Ext.P1 to P4.

5. The Forum allowed the complaint and directed the opposite parties to return the excess charges if any along with cost of Rs.300/-. It is the contention of the counsel for the appellant that the order is not specific.  We find that the Forum ought to have specified the amount liable to be returned failing which there is every  likelihood that there would be another round of litigation.  Hence the order of the Forum is set aside.  The matter is remitted back to the Forum.  The Forum is directed to issue notice to the opposite parties and dispose of the matter by a considered order.

The matter stands posted before the Forum on 23-09-2010.

The office will forward a copy of this order to the Forum.

 

JUSTICE K.R. UDAYABHANU:PRESIDENT

 

 

 

S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR : MEMBER

VL.

 

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 20 July 2010

[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT