Karnataka

Dharwad

CC/104/2017

Fakeerappa B.Madalli - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Assistant provident Fund Commissioner, - Opp.Party(s)

G.Geetabai

11 Oct 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER
DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, DHARWAD.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/103/2017
 
1. Panchappa Y.Tolkoppad
R/o: Kunimalla village, Tq:Savanur,
Haveri
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Assistant provident Fund Commissioner,
Behind income tax office, Navanagar, Hubli,
Dharwad
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
Complaint Case No. CC/104/2017
 
1. Fakeerappa B.Madalli
R/o: 2nd cross, Shivaji Nagar,
Haveri
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Assistant provident Fund Commissioner,
Behind income tax office, Navanagar, Hubli,
Dharwad
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
Complaint Case No. CC/105/2017
 
1. Basavareddi F.Banakar
R/o: Akkialur, Tq:Hangal,
Haveri
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Assistant provident Fund Commissioner,
Behind income tax office, Navanagar, Hubli,
Dharwad
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
Complaint Case No. CC/107/2017
 
1. Subhashchandra H. Daddikoppa
R/o: Tilvalli village, Tq:Hangal,
Haveri
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Assistant provident Fund Commissioner,
Behind income tax office, Navanagar, Hubli,
Dharwad
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
Complaint Case No. CC/108/2017
 
1. Virupakshgouda P.Channagoudar
R/o:Hirehullal village,Tq:Hangal,
Haveri
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Assistant provident Fund Commissioner,
Behind income tax office, Navanagar, Hubli,
Dharwad
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
Complaint Case No. CC/109/2017
 
1. Shivanand S.Gulappanavar
R/o: Near Govt B.C. Hostel. Nagendra matti,
Haveri
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
Behind income tax office, Navanagar, Hubli,
Dharwad
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SMT.SAMIUNNISA.C.H , IN CHARGE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHRI.BASAVARAJ S.KERI, IN CHARGE MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:G.Geetabai, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 11 Oct 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Both the advocate present. Complainant advocate filed a memo stating that the difference amount of pension of the complainant has been revised by the OP. Hence prayed to close the complaint.  Further Advocate of complainant submits that to direct the OP to issue the revised PPO and to pay cost.

                                           Heard.

                                          

                                          Order

Op is directed to issue the revised the PPO to the complainant and to pay Rs.2000 (Rupees Two Thousand only) towards the compensation as such complaint is disposed-off. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SMT.SAMIUNNISA.C.H , IN CHARGE]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHRI.BASAVARAJ S.KERI, IN CHARGE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.