Today is fixed for admission hearing.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant is present, submit documents with list & moves the complaint petition.

Heard & perused the documents.

Admittedly, complainant Binay Kumar Agarwala is not a consumer of W.B.S.E.D.C.L. It is also admitted that his father Gangadhar Agarwala (since deceased) & Elder Brother Durga Datta Agarwala (since deceased) were the consumer of W.B.S.E.D.C.L.

It appears that correspondences of Gangadhar Agarwala were dated 06.10.2015, 28.12.2015 & 18.02.2016 subsequent correspondences dated 06.09.2016, 17.02.2023, 28.02.2023, 28.07.2023 were submitted for Gangadhar Agarwala & Durga Datta Agarwala (perhaps since deceased). Electric bill in name of Gangadhar Agarwala with payment receipt & bill of Durga Datta Agarwala were of the year of 2022 & 2015.

Since the complainant is not a consumer under the W.B.S.E.D.C.L I am of the opinion that he has locus standai to lodge the consumer complaint against W.B.S.E.D.C.L

Hence, it is

O r d e r  e d

that the complaint registered as C.C-23/2024 be and the same is rejected.