Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/11/209

P.Arabi - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Assistant Engineer, K.S.E.B - Opp.Party(s)

E.Sukumaran, Geetha.N.V. Kanhangad

30 Dec 2013

ORDER

C.D.R.F. Kasaragod
Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/11/209
 
1. P.Arabi
S/o.Abdulla, R/at Kalichamaram, Po.Karindalam, Hosdurg Taluk
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Assistant Engineer, K.S.E.B
K.S.E.B, Choyamkode Section Office, Po.Choyamkode.
Kasaragod
Kerala
2. Shymalavally.K.V
Assistant Engineer, Electrcial Section, K.S.E.B. Choyamkode.Po.
Kasaragod
Kerala
3. The Executive Enginner
Electrical Division, Po.Kanhangad
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 30 Dec 2013
Final Order / Judgement

D.o.F: 17/8/11

D.o.O:30/12/2013

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                             CC.NO.209/11

                             Dated this, the 30th  day of December 2013

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI            : PRESIDENT

SMT.BEENA.K.G              : MEMBER    

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL    : MEMBER

P.Arabi,  S/o Abdulla,

 R/at Kalichamaram, Po.Karindalam,                                                   : Complainant

Hosdurg, Kasaragod.

(Adv.E.Sukumaran)

1. Asst. Engineer ,  Electrical Section, KSEB

Choyamkode Section Office,Choyamkode Section Office,

PO.Choyamkode, Hosdurg,Kasaragod.

2. Shymalavally.K.V, Asst.Engineer,

Electrical Section, KSEB

Choyamkode Section Office,Choyamkode Section Office,

PO.Choyamkode, Hosdurg,Kasaragod

3. Executive Engineer,KSEB, Electrical Division                              :           Opposite parties

Kanhangadd. Po.  ,Kasaragod.

 

                                                                         ORDER        

SMT.P.RAMADEVI       : PRESIDENT

    Heard both sides  an issue regarding maintainability of the complaint before this Forum.  The opposite party raised such an issue in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in  U.P.Power Corporation Ltd and others Vs. Anis Ahamad 2013 AIAR(Civil)758 wherein the Apex court hold that a complaint against assessment  made by the assessing officer under Section 126 or against the offences committed under sections 136 to 140 of the Electricity Act would not be maintainable before the  Consumer Forum as per the Consumer Protection Act.  .  Hence the complaint  is closed accordingly 

Sd/                                                                           Sd/                                                             Sd/

 MEMBER                                MEMBER                             PRESIDENT

eva                                                                        /Forwarded by Order/

                                                                        SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.