Karnataka

StateCommission

RA/86/2023

MANAGING DIRECTOR, - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, - Opp.Party(s)

R S HEGDE

25 Sep 2023

ORDER

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
Review Application No. RA/86/2023
( Date of Filing : 23 Aug 2023 )
In
First Appeal No. A/1566/2012
 
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR,
KARNATAKA STATE SEEDS CORPORATION LIMITED, BEEJA BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 024.
BENGALURU URBAN
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE,
AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, HOLALKERE, HOLALAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526
CHITRADURGA
KARNATAKA
2. SHIVAKUMARAIAH BIN KENCHA BASAIAH
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURE R/O. HULEMALALI, SHIVAPURA POST, HOLALAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577526
CHITRADURGA
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Sep 2023
Final Order / Judgement

RA/86/2023

 

 

 

25-09-2023

 

ORDERS ON ADMISSION

 

MRS. SUNITA CHANNABASAPPA BAGEWADI, MEMBER

 

         The Petitioner/appellant in Appeal No.1566/2012 preferred this Review Application being aggrieved by the order dated 24.7.2023 passed in the above appeal and for various reasons and prays to review the order dated 24.7.2023 and restore the said appeal in the interest of justice and equity.

 

2. Heard from the Revision Petitioner.

 

3. The Revision Petitioner submits that, this Commission dismissed the appeal on the ground that, an account of bonafide mistake on the part of the petitioner, having lost of the track of the hearing dates of the appeal, he could not represent and submit the arguments on the hearing dates. The absence of the counsel of petitioner is bonafide, unintentional and beyond his control. Further submits that, the petitioner has got very good case on merits and the Commission has noted the absence of petitioner and counsel and passed the dismissal order. Therefore, prays to set aside the order passed by this Commission and opportunity is given to the petitioner to address the arguments, in the interest of justice and equity.

 

4.  On going through the Review Application filed under Section 50 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and order passed by us, it is appropriate to quote the provisions of Section 50 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 hereunder;

“The State Commission shall have the power to review any of the order passed by it if there is an error apparent on the face of the record, either of its own motion or on an application made by any of the parties within thirty days of such order”.   

 

5. We noticed here that, the order passed by this Commission has no error either in law or any error apparent on the face of record as contemplated under Section 50 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

6. Ongoing through the review petition, certified copy of the order passed by this Commission. This appellant has preferred appeal being aggrieved by the order dated 10.7.2012 passed in CC.No.3/2012 before this Commission and we have passed the order on 24.7.2023. Inspite of sufficient opportunities provided to appellant and respondent, they have continuously absent and not argued the matter. Hence, we have taken the matters for orders and this commission had arrived to the conclusion after perusal of the entire pleadings and documents produced by the appellant. This commission has dismissed the appeal after consideration of the documents and pleadings. We found there is no any error in the order passed by this commission.     

 

7. As per the provisions of Section 50 of Consumer Protection Act 2019, if there is any error on law or error on the face of record, then only Review application can be filed, otherwise, if the appellant not satisfied with the order, he is at liberty to approach the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi as per the provisions of Consumer Protection Act by filing an appeal.  Hence, we do not find any merits in the Review Application.  Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following:-

O R D E R

The Review Application is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Notify the order to the parties and place this order/records along with concerned appeal records.

 

MEMBER                                   JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

jrk

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.