The complainant side is present . Ld advocates  Mr N.Dhar and Smti Shoma Das Gupta appear  for the complainant . We have heard submission of ld advocate Mr N.Dhar on the point of admissibility of the complainant . We have perused the complaint as well as the submission of ld advocate Mr N.Dhar .

       After  perusing the complaint , it appears to us that there is a strong dispute between complainant no-1 (INTUC represented by its General Secretary ,Administration ) and Sri Soumar Singh Gour ,General Secretary,Administration , INTUC in one side and opposite party no-7 (President of INTUC) and opposite party no-8 (G.Sanjiba Raddi ,President of INTUC) in other side , as to their repective legitimacy in day to day functioning of Indian National  Trade Union Congress . We found that  without disposing of this dispute , it cannot be determined whether the act of the opp. party no-1,2 and 3  holding  up the Savings Bank Account of opp. party no-1 that exists in opp. party no-1 bank is lawful or illegal . This forum has no jurisdiction  to adjudicate upon the dispute between the complainant no-1 and complainant no-2 in one side and opposite party no-7 and 8  in other side . This is a  matter within jurisdiction of the Civil Court . Secondly , although complainant no-1 seems to be a consumer of service , which is banking service , provided by opp. party no-1 , 2 and 3 , it  is seen that opp. party no-3 stopped the operation of Savings  Bank Account No-391042010028882 of complainant no-1 on  being representation submitted by the opp. party no-4 vide letter dtd. 18/05/2018 as General Secretary , Administration of complainant no-1 , while complainant side’s assertion is that opposite party no-4 is not legitimately elected secretary of opp. party no-1 . So, this is also a  dispute between the complainant side and opp. party no-4 , which is to be determined  by the Civil Court only . Morever , another plea of the complainant is that the operation of the said  savings bank account is stopped by opp. party no-3 after receiving a letter from opp. party no-5 dtd. 01/08/2018 , which is an illegal act on the part of the opp. party no-3 as opp. party no-5  has no authority to file such type of letter before opp. party no-3 . So, it is also a dispute between  complainants and opp. party no-5 as to the question of legitimacy of opp. party no-5 to file said letter before opp. party no-3 . So, this  forum has no jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the said dispute also .         

             Summing  up above discussion as above  , we are of opinion  that the dispute in respect of which the complainants file the present complaint before this forum are purely civil dispute between the parties , without disposing said disputes it cannot be determined whether the act  of stopping  the operation of the account of the complainant no-1 by opp. party no-1 ,2 and 3 side is lawful or illegal . Such types of disputes between the parties  cannot  be said to be a consumer dispute . Hence, there is no cause of action for admitting the complaint filed by the complainants as consumer dispute under the provisions of Consumer Protection Act , 1986 . Accordingly  the complaint is summarily dismissed reserving the right of the complainants to approach the civil court for proper relief.