Haryana

StateCommission

RP/25/2016

BIRBAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE ADARSH COOPERATIVE HOUSING BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

S.K.TANDON

03 Oct 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.

 

                                                Revision Petition No.   25 of 2016

                                                Date of the Institution:           26.02.2016

                                                Date of Decision:-        03.10.2016

 

 

Birbal son of Sh. Chhitar Singh, resident of House No.1993/5, Parvati Vihar Colony, Kurukshetra

…..Petitioner-Complainant

 

Versus

 

1.      The Adarsh Cooperative Housing Building Society Limited, Kurukshetra through its Secretary.

 

2.      The Haryana State Cooperative Housing Federation Limited, Panchkula through its Managing Director.

……….Respondents-Opposite Parties

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                    Mrs. Urvashi Agnihotri, Member.

 

Present:-    Birbal-petitioner in person with Mr. Tarun Dhingra, Advocate.

                   Mr. Pardeep Solath, Advocate assisted with Mr. Babu Ram, Vice President, The Adarsh Cooperative Housing Building Society Limited, Kurukshetra

                   Mr. Jeet Ram, Development Officer The Haryana State Cooperative Housing Federation Limited, Panchkula 

 

 

                                                O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH, J (ORAL)

 

          This complainant’s revision is directed against the order dated January 29^th, 2016 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kurukshetra (for short, ‘District Forum’) in Execution Application No.21 of 2015.  

2.      The complainant has handed over demand draft of Rs.51,237/- (Photocopy Annexure A-1) as calculated by the Chartered Accountant of the respondents, to Jeet Ram, Development Officer, The Haryana State Cooperative Housing Federation Limited, Panchkula-opposite party No.2 in full and final settlement of the loan account advanced to him. 

3.      Jeet Ram has also handed over all the documents required by the complainant including No Due Certificate to the complainant.  The statement of the complainant in this regard has been recorded separately. 

4.      In view of above, the revision petition stands disposed of.  

                   

 

 

October 03rd, 2016

Urvashi Agnihotri Member

B.M.Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President

 

U.K