Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/203/2013

THE SPECIAL OFFICER - Complainant(s)

Versus

THANGAVEL - Opp.Party(s)

K. PREMKUMAR

29 Nov 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.203/2013

(Against the order in C.C. No.16/2009, dated 28.03.2011 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Namakkal)

                                                             DATED THE 29th  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

 

1.The Special Officer,

   Mohanur S.No.1505, Mohanur Cooperative Building

   Society Ltd., Mohanur Post – 637 015.

   Namakkal Taluk & District.

 

2.The Secretary,

   Mohanur S.No.1505, Mohanur Cooperative Building

   Society Ltd., Mohanur Post – 637 015.

   Namakkal Taluk & District.                                                                                   .. Appellants / Opposite parties 1 & 2

 

-Vs-

1.Thangavel (Secretary),

   S.343, Sevitturangampathy PACB,

   Sevitturangampatty & Post,

   Namakkal TK & District.                                                                                      ..Respondent / Complainant

 

2.The Deputy Registrar(Housing)

   Deputy Registrar Office of East Garden,

   Fairlands, Salem  - 16. .                                                                                       ..2nd  Respondent/3rd Opposite party                  

 

Counsel for  Appellant                       : M/s. K.Premkumar

Counsel for 1st Respondent             : M/s. M.Thiyagarajan

Counsel for 2nd Respondent           : Served called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 29.11.2021 for appearance and for reporting compliance & for arguments and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                                            

Docket order

            No representation for  both.  This appeal is posted today for appearance & for reporting compliance  & for arguments in list. When the matter was called at 10.30 a.m the parties were not present  hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.30 pm, then also the parties  have not appeared. Hence keeping the appeal  pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence the appeal  is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

 

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                   Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                            R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.