Kerala

StateCommission

RP/11/6

BRANCH MANAGER,NIFE - Complainant(s)

Versus

TEX YESUDAS - Opp.Party(s)

V.S.BHASURENDRAN NAIR

02 Feb 2011

ORDER

 
Revision Petition No. RP/11/6
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/10/203 of District Idukki)
 
1. BRANCH MANAGER,NIFE
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. TEX YESUDAS
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

REV ISION PETITION . 06/2011

ORDER DATED: 02.02.2011

 

PRESENT

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU         : PRESIDENT

SRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR    : MEMBER

1. Branch Manager,                         : REVISION PETITIONERS

    NIFE, Puthenpurayil Building,

    Kallarkutty Road, Adimali.

 

2. The Director,

     NIFE,50/114, Railway Station Road,

     Edappally.

(By Adv.V.S.Bhasurendran Nair)

 

              Vs.

 

1. Tex Yesudas,                              : COUNTER PETITIONERS

     S/o Yesudas, Kainikunnel House,

     Koompanpara, Devikulam.

 

2. Ramesh Rajan,

     Marketing Executive, NIFE,

     Oliyamparambil Veedu, Koompanpara,

     Adimali.

 

 

ORDER

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU         : PRESIDENT

 

          The revision petitioner is the opposite party in CC.203/2010 in the file of CDRF, Idukki.  The revision petition is filed over the order of the Forum in the IA filed contending that the petition is not maintainable.  The Forum has dismissed the IA. 

          2. It is the contention of the counsel for the revision petitioner that the complainant has successfully completed the course and thereafter he has  sought for refund of the  course fee and hence the complaint is not maintainable.  It is also contended that the complainant has signed in the document containing the terms and conditions wherein it is not mentioned that placement will be provided.  It is further contended by the counsel that it is specifically mentioned  in the terms and conditions that the institution is not obliged to provide placement.  We find that the above all are  matters that has to be adjudged by the Forum.  The contention that the complaint is not maintainable cannot be sustained.  We find there is no illegality at all in the order of the Forum.  There is no scope for admitting the revision petition.  The revision petition is dismissed in limine .

          Office will forward the copy of this order to the Forum urgently.

 

          JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU         : PRESIDENT

          SRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR    : MEMBER

 

ps

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.