Karnataka

Mysore

CPA/91-92/18

M.Noorul Haq - Complainant(s)

Versus

Telecom - Opp.Party(s)

28 Feb 1995

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
consumer case(CC) No. CPA/91-92/18

M.Noorul Haq		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Telecom		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Adv. for o.p. prays for time. Heard, sufficient time has been granted to o.p. to lead evidence. No justification for grant of further time. Reuqest is refused. The evidence of o.p. is closed. Complainant files his written arguments. Adv. for o.p. says that she has already filed her written arguments and has nothing move to add.