Haryana

StateCommission

EA/11/2021

ANITA - Complainant(s)

Versus

TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

PS BEDI

25 Feb 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Execution Application No. EA/11/2021
( Date of Filing : 26 Aug 2021 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/92/2017
 
1. ANITA
W/O RAJ SINGH VILL NO.345 SECTOR 19 BLOCK B OMAXE CITY SONPEAT
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD.
UG FLOOR VANDANA BUILDING 11, TOLSTOY MARG CONNAUGHT PLACE NEW DELHI
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  A S Narang, PRESIDING MEMBER
  Suresh Chander Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

 

 

                                                    Execution Application No.11 of 2021 in

                                              Consumer Complaint No.92 of  2017

                                          Date of the Institution: 26.08.2021

                                  Date of Decision: 25.02.2022

 

 

Smt. Anita W/o Shri Raj Singh Age 49 years, R/o Villa No.345, Sector-19, (Block B), Omaxe City, Sonepat (Haryana)

 

                                      .….Decree Holders-Complainant

Versus

1.      M/s. TDI Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (formally known as intime promoters Pvt. Ltd.), through its director UG Floor, Vandana Building, 11, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi, 110001.

 

2.      M/s. TDI City, Kundli through Deputy Manager, Site Office at Mani NH-1, Kundli, Sonepat.

.….Judgment Debtors-Opposite parties

CORAM:    Mr.A S Narang, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member.

 

 

Present:-    Mr. Pavinder Singh Bedi, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant.     

Mr. Munish Gupta, counsel for the Judgment Debtors-opposite parties

                  

                                                O R D E R

 

A.S. NARANG, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

 

 

(The matter has been heard through virtual hearing).

2.                Mr. Pavinder Singh Bedi, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant has made a statement at the Bar that that he may be permitted to withdraw the present execution application with a liberty to file a fresh. His statement in this regard recorded separately.

3.                On the other hand, Mr. Munish Gupta, counsel for the Judgment Debtors-opposite parties has no objection to the same.

 

4.                In view of the statement made by Mr. Pavinder Singh Bedi, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant the present execution application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file a fresh one. File be consigned to the record room.

 


 

February 25th, 2022                   Suresh Chander Kaushik                        A S Narang                                                        Member                                              Judicial Member

                                                    Addl. Bench                                               Addl. Bench  

                                                                       

J.Y.

 
 
[ A S Narang,]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ Suresh Chander Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.