Delhi

StateCommission

CC/11/135

SURESH DUTT SHARMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

29 Jul 2015

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

                                            Date of Decision: 29/07/2015

Consumer Complaint No. 135/2011

In the matter of:

1.      Shri Suresh Dutt Sharma

S/o Shri Dhari Singh Sharma

R/o 185/A-4, Konark Apartments,

Kalkaji Extn.,

New Delhi-110019

 

2.      Smt. Neeta Sharma

        W/o Sh. Suresh Dutt Sharma,

        R/o 185/A-4, Konark Apartments,

        Kalkaji Extn.,

        New Delhi-110019                                       Complainants

 

Versus

 

M/S TDI Infrastructure Ltd.

9, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,

Connaught Place,

New Delhi-110001                                               Opposite Party

CORAM

 

 

SH N P KAUSHIK                             -                  Member (Judicial)

SH. S.C. JAIN                          -                  Member

 

1.       Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?

2.       To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

N P KAUSHIK – MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

 

JUDGEMENT

 

                Ld. Counsel for the OP has drawn the attention of this Commission to the settlement arrived at between the parties after filing of the present complaint.  The document which is titled “Discharge” shows that the complainant Sh. Suresh Dutt Sharma has admitted the signature(s) of his wife thereon.  It is also admitted by the complainant Sh. S.D. Sharma that the said settlement was entered into after filing of the present complaint.  The complaint was filed by the complainant on 19/7/2011.

        A careful perusal of the settlement (which is exhibited as C-1 at the time of dictating these orders) shows that the Complainants have admitted that their claim stands fully satisfied, complainant having received an amount of Rs. 6 lakh from the OP.  The relevant portion of the settlement is reproduced below:-

“Henceforth, there shall be no claim by me against TDI Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and its Associate Companies its Directors, Officials and Staff which relates to my/our Advance Registration Application Form.

I/we further undertake to withdraw all my/our claims, notices, letters and complaints be if civil or criminals which were made by me/us pursuant to the Advance Registration Application Form.”

        The complainant having entered into a settlement with the OP and also having received an amount of Rs. 6 lakh towards the said settlement, cannot be allowed to continue with the present complaint.  The same is hence disposed of  as compromised.

        File be sent to records.

 

 

(N P KAUSHIK)

MEMBER (JUDIUCIAL)

 

 

 

(S.C.  JAIN)

MEMBER

 

(m)

 

        

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.