Haryana

StateCommission

MA/163/2018

Deepak Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

TDI Infrastructure Limited - Opp.Party(s)

07 Mar 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                                                             

 

                                      Miscellaneous Application No.163 of 2018

                                      In First Appeal No :                157 of 2018

                                      Date of Institution:                             12.09.2018

                                      Date of Decision :                    07.03.2019

 

 

Deepak Kumar son of Jasmer Singh, resident of House No.31, Subhash Colony, Panipat.

          Appellant-Complainant

 

Versus

 

 

1.      TDI Infrastructure Limited, 9, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110 001.

 

2.      TDI Infrastructure Limited, Customer Care Centre, TDI House, G-7, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110 001.

 

3.      TDI Infrastructure Limited, Kundli, near Delhi Border, District Sonepat.

                                      Applicants-Opposite Parties

 

 

 

 

CORAM:             Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President.

                             Shri Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member                      

 

 

 

Present:              Shri Nihal Singh, proxy counsel for Mr. Munish Gupta, counsel for the applicants-opposite parties

 

 

                                                   O R D E R

 

 

T.P.S. MANN J.

 

          Complaint filed by Deepak Kumar was allowed by the learned District Consumer Forum, Sonepat by directing the opposite parties to refund the amount of Rs.9,90,527/- alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the complaint till its realization.  The complainant filed an appeal against the order of the learned District Forum seeking refund from the date of deposit instead of date of filing of the complaint.          

2.      The plea was accepted by the Commission by directing refund of the deposited amount alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the date of deposit till its realization.

3.      Aggrieved from the order of the Commission, the opposite parties filed the present miscellaneous application for review/recalling of the order of the Commission.

4.      Once the Commission has disposed of the appeal by directing the refund of the deposited amount alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the date of deposit till its realization, the only remedy available to the opposite parties was to move the Hon’ble National Consumer Commission, New Delhi instead of filing the present application for review/recalling as the Commission has no power to review/recall its order.

5.      In view of above, the application is hereby dismissed being not maintainable.  

 

 

Announced 07.03.2019

(Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member

(T.P.S. Mann) President

UK