Maharashtra

Pune

CC/12/554

DENSO THERMAL SYSTEM PUNE PVT. LTD., - Complainant(s)

Versus

TATA Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited, - Opp.Party(s)

D. C. Adkar

09 Nov 2012

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/554
 
1. DENSO THERMAL SYSTEM PUNE PVT. LTD.,
Gat No.1228/2,Sanaswadi, Tal. Shirur Dist. Pune-412 208. M.S.
Pune
Maha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. TATA Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited,
A1 Aqmar Bldg Behind Kala Niketan, Opp. Sancheti Hospital, Ganesh Khind Rd., Shivaji Nagar, Pune-411 005.
Pune
Maha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Smt. Anjali Deshmukh PRESIDENT
  Shri. S. K. Kapase MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

द्वारा-  श्रीमती. अंजली देशमुख, मा. अध्‍यक्ष
 
                                     निकालपत्र
                       दिनांक 09 नोव्‍हेंबर 2012
 
तक्रारदारांची तक्रार थोडक्‍यात खालीलप्रमाणे-
1.           तक्रारदारांनी सदरील तक्रार टाटा टेलिसर्व्हिसेस [महाराष्‍ट्र] लि.यांच्‍याविरुध्‍द एक्‍सेस बिला संदर्भात दाखल केलेली आहे.  
            मा. सर्वोच्‍च न्‍यायालयाचा निवाडा  सिव्‍हील अपील नं 7687/2004 जनरल मॅनेजर, टेलिकॉम विरुध्‍द एम. कृष्‍णन व इतर या निवाडयानुसार “In our opinion when there is a special remedy provided in Section 7-B of the Indian Telegraph Act regarding disputes in respect of telephone bills, then the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred.Section 7B of the Telegraph Act reads as under-
S.7B Arbitration of Disputes-
(1)                                       Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, if any dispute concerning any telegraph line, appliance or apparatus arises between the telegraph authority and the person or whose benefit the line, appliance or apparatus is, or has been provided, the dispute shall be determined by arbitration and shall, for the purpose of such determination, be referred to an arbitrator appointed by the Central Government either specifically for the determination of that dispute or generally for he determination of disputes under this section.
(2)                                       The award of the arbitrator appointed under sub-s(1) shall be conclusive between the parties to the dispute and shall not be questioned in any court.”    असे नमूद करण्‍यात आलेले आहे.
 
वरील मा. वरिष्‍ठ न्‍यायालयाच्‍या निवाडयावरुन ग्राहक मंचास प्रस्‍तूत तक्रार चालविण्‍याचा अधिकार नाही म्‍हणून  तक्रार दाखल करते वेळेसच तक्रार नामंजुर करण्‍यात येत आहे-
     
                        :- आदेश :-
[1]    तक्रार नामंजुर करण्‍यात येत आहे. तक्रारदार त्‍यांच्‍या मागण्‍यांसाठी योग्‍य
त्‍या अॅथोरिटी कडे प्रकरण दाखल करु शकतात.
[2]    खर्चाबद्यल आदेश नाही.
आदेशाची प्रत तक्रारदारांना नि:शुल्‍क पाठविण्‍यात यावी.
 
 
 
[ Smt. Anjali Deshmukh]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Shri. S. K. Kapase]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.