Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/274/2012

Tejinder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tata Motors - Opp.Party(s)

Tejinder Pal Singh

09 May 2013

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 274 of 2012
1. Tejinder SinghR/o # 45, lakhwindra Enclave, Ropar. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Tata Motorsthrough its Manager having registered Office at Global Administration Service Pvt. Ltd, Vatika Triangle, 5th Floor, Sushant Lok I, Block AMG Road, Gurgaon 122002, Hr.2. Hind Motors India Ltd, through its Managing Director, having its Registered Office at Plot No. 9, Industrial Area, Phase I, Chandigarh..3. Joshi Auto Zone Pvt. Ltd, through its Managing Director having registered Office at 84/85, Industrial Area, Phase II, Chandigarh 160002.. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 09 May 2013
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.274 of 2012

 

 

Tejinder Singh        Vs.    Tata Motors & ors.

  

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Tejinder Singh, Complainant in person alongwith Sh.Tejinder Pal Singh, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh.P.K.Kukreja, Counsel for OP No.1 & 2.

Sh.Rajesh Verma, Counsel for OP No.3.

 

Dated the 9th day of May, 2013

 

ORDER

 

            Sh.Tejinder Singh, Complainant, has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, I reserve my right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect.”

 

 

          In view of the above said statement of complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect, as per law. 

          Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

            Sd/-                                          Sd/-                                          Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER

 


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER