Kerala

Kottayam

CC/49/2020

Lizzy Biji - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tata Motors - Opp.Party(s)

Francis Thomas

13 Dec 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/49/2020
( Date of Filing : 06 Mar 2020 )
 
1. Lizzy Biji
Parenkulangara House, Vadavathoor P O Kottayam
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Tata Motors
82 Mahakali Caves Raod, M1 DC Andheri East Mumbai. Represented by its General Manager.
2. M.K Motors
Kodimatha, Kottayam. Represented by its Manager.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 13 Dec 2021
Final Order / Judgement

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 13th day of December, 2021

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Smt. Bindhu R. Member

 Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

C C No. 49/2020 (filed on 06-03-2020)

 

Petitioner                                 :    Lissy Biji,

                                                     W/o Biji Mathew,

                                                      Parenkulangara House, Vadavathoor P.O.,

                                                      Kottayam.     (Adv.Francis Thomas )

                                                                   Vs.                                          

Opposite parties                      :  1)  Tata Motors,

                                                         82 Mahakali Caves Road,

                                                         MI DC Andheri East,   Mumbai – 400093,

                                                         Rep. by its General Manager.

                           (Adv.V. Krishna Menon, Adv. M.K. Jose,

                             Adv. Prinsun Philip)

                                                   2)   M.K. Motors,

                                                         Kodimatha, Kottayam,

                                                         Rep. by its Manager.

                                                         (Adv.Anu George, Adv.Anu Santthan,

                                                             Adv. Rosh Mathew,

                                                             Adv. Sudhin Kumar U., Adv.Gopika

                                                             Gopinath, Adv. Appu Jose, Adv.Aibel

                                                             Mathew Siby)

                                               

                                                          O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

            Complainant and opposite parties represented.  Counsel for the complainant submitted complaint is not pressing.  A not pressed memo is also filed by the counsel for the complainant.  Hence the complaint is deposed as not pressed.   

   Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 13th day of December, 2021

          Sri. Manulal V.S. President   Sd/-

          Smt. Bindhu R.  Member      Sd/-

          Sri. K.M. Anto, Member         Sd/-

          By Order 

 

                                                                                             Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.