Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/12/182

Arpit Navnath Karale - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tata Motors Ltd.Tata Motors Finance, - Opp.Party(s)

28 Mar 2013

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR 5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1 CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001

First Appeal No. A/12/182 (Arisen out of Order Dated 08/07/2012 in Case No. CC/22/2010 of District Amravati)   1. Arpit Navnath Karale R/o.Village Mogra, Tq.& Dist. Amravati ...........Appellant(s) Versus 1. Tata Motors Ltd.Tata Motors Finance, Cybertech House,1 st floor,Plot No.B-63-65, Road No.21-34, J .B. Marg, Wagale Estate, Thane. 2. M/s.Nangia Motors, Commercial Vehical Dealer C-7.MIDC, Hingana, Nagpur Nagpur M S ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:     Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL MEMBER   HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER

PRESENT: None ......for the Appellant   Adv.Nerkar ......for the Respondent

ORDER   Appellant as well as his counsel Shri. Raut are absent.   Adv. Shri.Nerkar for Respondent 2 is present. Adv.Miss.Ghatole appeared for Respondent 1 and filed her VP today. Record reflects that the appellant as well as his counsel are absent since long. Therefore, the appeal deserves to be dismissed in default.   On perusal of record, it further reflects that there is also delay condonation application pending. On perusal of the same application for condonation of delay, it reflects that there was inordinate delay of more than 78 days in preferring the appeal, but no plausible explanation appears to have been given for such delay. Therefore, on this count also, the appeal deserves to be dismissed. Hence it be recalled at 3.00 p.m. for orders..   Matter is recalled at 3.15 p.m. However, the appellant did not turn up. Hence the appeal is dismissed in default.

[ Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole] PRESIDING MEMBER   [ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL] MEMBER   [ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM] MEMBER