Orissa

Jagatsinghapur

CC/145/2022

Sri.Rabindra Nayak - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tata Motors Finance Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.P.Pradhan

15 Dec 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION JAGATSINGHPUR
JAGATSINGHPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/145/2022
( Date of Filing : 21 Jun 2022 )
 
1. Sri.Rabindra Nayak
At-Kathgada Po-Bhutamundai Ps-Paradeep lock
Jagatsinghpur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Tata Motors Finance Ltd.
At-Sri . H.C.Dinshaw Building Office No 14 4th Floor Horiman Cirle forth Mumbai 400001
2. Tata Motors Finance Ltd
At- 98, Kharavel Nagar, Unit-III, Bhubaneswar, Dist.- Khruda- 751001
3. Branch Manager, Tata Motors Finance Ltd
At- Bhaskar Complex, Near IFFCO Chhak, Paradeep, Dist.- Jagatsinghpur
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Mr. S.K. Naik, Advocate, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 15 Dec 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                          C.C. No.145/2022

 

Rabindra Nayak,

S/o. Late Babaji Charan Nayak,

At- Kathgada,

P.O.- Bhutamundai,

P.S.- Paradeep Lock,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.………Complainant

 

  1. Tata Motors Finance Ltd.

Represented through its Managing Director,

Registered Head Office

At- Sir H.C. Dinshaw Building,

Office No.14, 4th Floor,

16 Horniman Circle, Fort,

Mumbai, Maharastra- 400001.

  1. Tata Motors Finance Ltd.

Represented through its Branch Manager,

At- 98, Kharavel Nagar,

Unit-III, Bhubaneswar,

Dist.- Khruda- 751001.

  1. Branch Manager,

Tata Motors Finance Ltd.

At- Bhaskar Complex,

Near IFFCO Chhak, Paradeep,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.                                       …..… Opposite parties                 

 

For Complainant………..Mr. P. Pradhan & Associates

For Opposite Parties………..Mr. S.K. Naik, Advocate

 

Date of Hearing: 16.11.2023                   Date of Judgment: 15.12.2023

ORDER BY HON’BLE MEMBER- MRS. M. SWAIN:

                                                                                                   JUDGMENT

            Counsel for complainant is absent. Heard Mr. S. Naik counsel for opposite parties, who submitted that the contract i.e. loan account No.5002858799 has already been changed by the complainant. As such the present consumer complaint has became infructous and accordingly consumer complaint is dismissed without any cost.

            Pronounced in the open Commission on this 15th Dec.,2023.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.