Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/326/2010

Rajneesh Kumar bansal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tata Finance Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Suresh Mankotia

21 Oct 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 326 of 2010
1. Rajneesh Kumar bansalson of Sh. Hemraj bansal R/o Huose No. 376 Sector-30/A Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Tata Finance Ltd.SCO No. 449-450 SEctor-35/C Chandigarh through its Branch Manager2. Tata Finance Limited Bezzola Complex First Floor V.N.Purv Marg Chambur Mumbai through itsManaging Director3. Pascos G.T. Karnal Road Kundali District Sonipat Haryana Through its authorized representative.Manager ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Suresh Mankotia, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 21 Oct 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Complaint Case No. 326 of 2010

 

Rajneesh Kumar Bansal, son of Sh.Hemraj Bansal, resident of House No.376, Sector 30-A, Chandigarh.

                                                                                                            … Complainant

                                                            Versus

 

1.         Tata Finance Limited, SCO No.449-450, Sector 35-C, Chandigarh, through its Branch Manager.

 

2.         Tata Finance Limited, Bezzola Complex, First Floor, V.N. Purv Marg, Chambur, Mumbai, through its Managing Director.

 

3.         Pascos, G.T. Karnal Road, Kundli, District Sonipat, Haryana, through its authorized representative/Manager.

 

                                                                                                … Opposite Parties

Present:          None for the Complainant.

                        Sh.Sandeep Suri, Advocate for OP No.1 & 2.

                        OP No.3 ex-parte.

ORDER

 

                        The case called out several times but neither the complainant nor anybody else on his behalf has turned up.

                        A perusal of the complaint reveals that the complainant has claimed Rs.20,00,000/- on account of damages, mental tension, agony and torture along with costs of litigation with further interest @ 18% p.a., which is beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum. That being so, the complaint is not maintainable here in this Forum. The complaint is accordingly dismissed. However, the complainant would be at liberty to seek remedy before the appropriate Forum or Commission in accordance with law.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

 

21.10.2010                      (MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA)                        (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)      

                                                                MEMBER                                                     PRESIDING   MEMBER             

 


DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,