Karnataka

Raichur

DCFR 19/07

Sofi Sharamad S/o. Peersab - Complainant(s)

Versus

Tata Finance Ltd., Hubli - Opp.Party(s)

H.Meenappa

09 Mar 2007

ORDER


DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,DC Office Compound, Sath Kacheri
consumer case(CC) No. DCFR 19/07

Sofi Sharamad S/o. Peersab
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Tata Finance Ltd., Hubli
Tata Finance Ltd.,Bangalore.
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Counsel for complainant files a memo for not pressing the complaint with hearing to file fresh complaint on same cause of action. Perused. Memo. Heard. Hence complaint is dismissed as not pressed with hearing to file fresh complaint on same cause of action. Return the documents filed with complaint under due acknowledgement. File be closed.