BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

SHRI. G. SIVAPRASAD                                :           PRESIDENT

SMT. SATHI. R                                              :           MEMBER

SMT. LIJU B. NAIR                                       :           MEMBER

                                             C.C.No : 316/2012     Filed on  14/09/2012

                                          Dated:  31..10..2013

Complainant:

Sobha Kumari, Uthradom, KP 20/194, CMC Lane, CMRA -10, Nalanchira – P.O., Thiruvananthapuram – 695 015.

            (Party in person)

Opposite parties:

1. TATA  DOCOMO, Opp. Lakshmi Vilas Bank, Sasthamangalam, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 010.
2. TATA Teleservices Ltd., SL Plaza, Palarivattam, Kochi – 682 025.

        (By Adv. M.V. Vinod)

ORDER

           Complainant absent in spite of specific direction to appear on this day. No representation also. Opposite parties already raised issue regarding the maintainability of the complaint, in view of the law as observed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court holding that a telephone dispute is not cognisable by Consumer Forum as the Provision of Section 7-B of the Indian Telegraph Act would operate as impediment in resolution of telephone dispute. Hence complaint is dismissed as not maintainable. Complainant is at liberty to approach appropriate authority for redressal of grievance if any.

                                                  Sd/-

         G. SIVAPRASAD                      :           PRESIDENT

                                                Sd/-

R. SATHI                                :           MEMBER

                                    LIJU B. NAIR                           :           MEMBER