Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/653/2010

Sunil Dahra - Complainant(s)

Versus

TATA AIG Life Insurance Co.Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

09 Nov 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 653 of 2010
1. Sunil DahraR/o 2586 Near Gurudwara Singh Sabha Rajpura District Patiala ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. TATA AIG Life Insurance Co.Ltd.SCO 40-42 Second Floor SEctor-8/C above Axis Bank, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 09 Nov 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                           

Complaint Case No. 653 of 2010

 

 

Sunil Dahra, R/o 2586, Near Gurudwara Singh Sabha Rajpura, Distt. Patiala.

                                                                                                ---Complainant

 

                                                            Versus

 

Tata Aig Life Ins. Co. Ltd. SCO 40-42, Second Floor, Sector 8 C, above Axis Bank, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh.

 

                                                                                                ---Opposite Party

 

Present:          None for the Complainant.

                       

                                                                                               

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The case is at preliminary stage. The case was called out several times but neither the complainant nor anybody else on his behalf has turned up. A perusal of the previous zimni orders depicts that complainant did not turn up to pursue his case after filing the complaint. Accordingly, the complaint is hereby dismissed for default of appearance of the complainant.

                        Copy of this order free of cost be supplied to the complainant. The file be consigned.

 

 

09.11.2010                       (MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA)                        (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)      

                                                                MEMBER                                                     PRESIDING   MEMBER



DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,