Delhi

StateCommission

FA/972/2013

SHAILENDER SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

08 Jul 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. FA/972/2013
(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/01/2013 in Case No. CC/150/2012 of District New Delhi)
 
1. SHAILENDER SINGH
82-C,BLOCK -CC,SHALIMAR BAGH,DELHI 110088
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.
1ST FLOOR,LOTUS TOWERS,NEW FRIENDS COLONY COMMUNITY CENTER,NEW DELHI -110025
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                 Date of Decision: 08.07.2014

                                    

First Appeal – 972/2013

 

Sh. Shailendra Singh,

S/o Lt YP Singh,

82-C, Block-CC,

Shalimar Bagh,

Delhi-110088.

………Appellant

Vs

 

M/s. Tata AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Ist Floor, Lotus Towers,

New Friends Colony,

Community Centre,

New Delhi-110025.

……..Respondent

 

 

CORAM

 

Salma Noor, Presiding Member

NP Kaushik, Member(Judicial)

 

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

 

SALMA NOOR, PRESIDING MEMBER

 

1.     In a complaint case bearing No.150/2012 Shailendra Singh vs TATA AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd. filed before District Forum, New Delhi on 09.01.2013, the Complainant was not present and the Forum dismissed the complaint in complainant’s default. 

 

2.      That is what brings the Complainant/Appellant in appeal before this Commission. 

 

 

 

3.     We have heard Sh. Anand K. Mishra, Counsel for the  Appellant at the admission stage as there is no need to hear the Respondent.

         

4.        The version of the complainant/appellant is that he  earlier appointed Mr. Suresh Sharma, Counsel to represent his case before the Forum.  However the advocate appointed by him communicated that the matter is listed in first week of July, 2013.  Thereafter, the Complainant/Appellant has made several calls to his earlier counsel regarding the status of his case.  On receiving no communication from him, the appellant hired new counsel to represent him before the Forum.  On inquiry it was disclosed by the registry of the concerned forum that the matter was dismissed in default on 9.1.2013. There is no plausible reason not to rely and not to act upon this version of the appellant. It has never been the policy of law to stifle a contest and wherever possible, under the circumstances a lenient view in this regard has been recommended, so that the parties may have an opportunity to present their case and the matter be decided on merit. We therefore, allow the appeal setting aside the dismissal orders dated 09.01.2013 in question, and remand the case back to District Forum, New Delhi with a direction to restore the complaint on its original number, and to further proceed in the case according to law.  The Appellant/ Complainant is directed to appear before the District Forum, New Delhi on 11.08.2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.   A copy of this order be sent to District Forum, New Delhi to keep it on complaint file and for compliance.

 

 

       

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.